Previous Story
Gingrich, Huckabee Don’t Want Romney to Lead State Dept.
Posted On 24 Nov 2016
President-elect Donald Trump is still keeping the country in suspense as it pertains to his choice for secretary of state, but many insiders believe that former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney is the top contender for the post. Romney, one of Trump’s harshest Republican critics for the past year, met with Trump last weekend. While some have said the Romney pick would be a display of good leadership on Trump’s part, others see it as a slap in the face.
Some in the latter camp are among Trump’s biggest supporters, including former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee.
Speaking to Fox News this week, Huckabee said that a Romney pick “would be a real insult to all those Donald Trump voters who worked really hard.”
“I’m still very unhappy that Mitt did everything he could to derail Donald Trump,” Huckabee said. “He didn’t just go after him from the standpoint of ‘I disagree with his policy on immigration, I disagree with his policy on taxes.’ He attacked him on a personal level about his character, integrity, his honor.”
In the waning days of the Republican primaries, Romney gave a highly-publicized speech at Utah’s Hinckley University where he condemned the then-frontrunner as a “fraud” who would destroy the party.
Huckabee said that Trump should not even consider Romney for a cabinet position unless he “goes to a microphone in a very public place and repudiates everything he said.”
Gingrich said that Romney was not necessarily on board with the “kind of tough-minded America-first policies that Trump has campaigned on.”
“I can think of 20 other people who would be more naturally compatible with the Trump vision of foreign policy,” Gingrich said.
This isn’t just limited to public appeals. Trump’s top advisor, Kellyanne Conway, told CNN on Thursday that she had received a “deluge” of comments from Trump supporters who are angry about the possible Romney pick.
“I am struck by the intensity and volume of resistance from the grassroots; words like ‘betrayal,’” Conway said. “I communicate with PEOTUS and VPEOTUS privately and regularly so this is not an attempt to do so publicly as some (who missed the election completely) are suggesting.”
WHY WOULD TRUMP EVEN CONSIDER MITT,AFTER ALL THE DEROGATORY REMARKS AND STATEMENTS HE SPEWED DURING THE CAMPAIGN. HE IS A BACK STABBER AND SHOULD NOT BE TRUSTED. MORE QUALIFIED CANDIDATES ARE WAITING IN THE WINGS WHO SUPPORTED TRUMP FROM THE BEGINNING AND ARE LOYAL TO THE CORE. HOPEFULLY TRUMP WILL CONSIDER THE FACTS AND NOMINATE A TRUE AMERICAN TO THE POST.
WHY ARE YOU SCREAMING AT US?
He wants America to hear!! Got it..
He has the right to use all caps. What the big deal?
Because it is considered rude. Anyone can use all caps if they want to as long as I don’t have to read it. If you type in a manor that a lot of people don’t like, don’t expect everyone to read your post. If you don’t care if it is read, be my guest. Poor spelling and bad grammar doesn’t really bother me because everyone is not good at those things. Typing in all caps is intentional and I imagine that is why it is considered rude.
Purveyors of nonsense usually do !
At ease, Kat!! Your ears aren’t hurt and large letters are probably easier to read for some people who are losing their eyesight.
I am 74 and they hurt my ears and eyes.
Maybe you should give up reading.
I’ll turn 76 in a couple of weeks and they don’t bother my ears a bit, possibly because I don’t hear all that well any more. They do definitely bother my eyes.
She has some kind of personal problem.
Try control, shift + if you need bigger type.
Love it, some people are just looking for something to knit pick about.
All caps posts are like being stabbed in the eyes to me. I don’t read them because of that. They look like gibberish to me because they make the post look like one big long word. It is also considered rude, sort of like yelling in someone’s ear.
He’s just making a valid point. If typing in all caps is the worst display of his righteous anger then so be it. Hillary people are physically violent and mentally cruel given the opportunity. I witnessed that on the ship Queen Mary 2 on a Trans Atlantic crossing. A passenger a little gal from America was verbally assaulted by a pro HILLARY “men”. I came to her rescue because they did not like her response to their pro Clintons question. Caps are ok.
Yahoo is pro-Clinton to the nth degree. Completely dissing Trump too.
Absolutely. WHORES that they are.
I just wish that the entire msm & establishment politicians will (very soon) get over their whining.
Yes. Now that Stein has this scam of a fundraiser challenging voter numbers.
She got what 8,000 votes against Trumps millions?
Stein is do off balance one can only hope she gets the medication she needs.
If not, merely vote them down next time they are in election mode. ppfftt!
Agree!
This is a movement going forward!
Romney will be a divisive pick and we do not need desencion in the ranks and among the citizens!
Kick Romney out of the picture, and do it Quickly!
Many are already very upset over this possible pick even if it were for dog catcher!
He is despicable. ROMNEY is a discredit to his church family and government.
Have you considered that Trump is considering him because Romney is a better choice than the likes of Gingrich and Huckabee who, very likely, jumped on the Trump bandwagon in the hopes of being rewarded with a cabinet position. At least Romney was honest in his assessment of Trump.
Best choice in Romney’s eyes, not those that really count.
I must respectfully disagree. I have seen no evidence that Romney pushed himself for this position (unlike some of the other sycophants). It is Trump’s choice, and unfortunately, that is who counts.
Ansolute Bull-Hockey! If he was honest, for people like you, he certainly has NO business in the Trump Administration! Either Gingrich or Huckabee is a far better candidate for a Trump nomination than that backstabbing Moron!
As I said below, he has a place in Trump’s administration if he is who Trump wants – and if the Senate confirms him.
Lizzie is just a troll. Disregard everything she posts. Hillary WHORE and sore loser.
It’s a waste of time asking, but can you give one example of my been either a Hillary whore, or a sore loser?
While I do wholeheartedly agree that Romney is a far better choice , you are an anti-Constitutionalist! It very likely you did in fact support Hillary, though originally you might have been a Sanders supporter!
Very perceptive! I was indeed a Sanders supporter, and reluctantly voted for Hillary as there is no way that I would ever have voted for Trump.
More than being an anti-Constitutionalist, I feel very strongly that the time has come for that revered document to have a serious overhaul.
Should an Article Five Convention ever become a reality, I’d like to see the Seventeenth Amendment repealed in it’s entirety. The first sentence of the Fourteenth struck and a definition of the term “Natural Born” inserted!
Ah, but!!!! Article 5 is one of the problems. Put another way, Congress is the problem and we can’t expect them to fix it.
Any change needs to come from the people. Either one gets a fair-sized group of impartial (and bright) individuals together to draft a new constitution that is put to the people via plebiscite and then ratifies by the states; or one surveys the people to see what they want.
I’ll resist that movement with Arms if necessary! You want to change it do it right! If you can’t live with it, the borders are open, please feel free to seek a country more in keeping with your ideology!
I’ve defended Her before and I’ll gladly do so again. My oath was to defend Her against ANY enemies Foreign or “Domestic” and make no mistake I WILL!
The Constitution is not the Holy Grail. It has served us well for quite a long time, but nothing is perfect. There is always a better way.
It is very near to perfect, made so because of the wisdom of our Founders! Their lack of pretentiousness allowed them to include Article Five. They recognized that they could not possibly foresee every future need for the Country they worked so hard to create. They also foresaw that corruption was inevitable in any government, so while they made it possible, they didn’t make it easy!
It is, as it should be! You are looking for an easier, softer way, which ALWAYS creates destruction! If it is necessary enough, believed so by a sufficient number of Americans, Article Five will make it possible!
I am not at all looking for an easier, softer way. Thomas Jefferson suggested that the constitution should be revisited every generation, which means that we are in line for about 26 revisions. But they have not happened, and now the document has attained the status of gospel, making it very hard to change, Article Five notwithstanding.
Indeed he said,”revisited”, NOT changed, unless said change is found necessary by a significant number of citizens. In fact it has been, revisited and seventeen changes have been found necessary since that time! The last change occurred in 1992!
There is very little point in revisiting if that does not lead to change.
It’s known as Quality Assurance, In any case, if it isn’t broke, why the he_ _ would you try to “fix” it!
My copy of the Constitution lists 27 changes (aka amendments), the last one having been ratified – as you rightly say in 1992, just 202 years after it was first introduced!
Could we just, at the very least, re-write the Constitution so that the amendments are incorporated into the articles in language that does not need a constitutional lawyer to decifer?
Yes, of course there are 27 Amendments. However the first ten were ratified almost at the same time as was the Constitution itself, they were proposed, by Jefferson himself, in June of 1789, just under a year after the Constitution became effective. It took a little over a year for the Bill of Rights to become officially a part of the Constitution. There were Twelve originally proposed Ten were adopted. I personally see no need to take any such actions! It would effectively change nothing, all 27 are already a part of Constitutional Law.
Establishment overhaul…yes indeed. However, not to a socialist (very close to communist) liking. That’s Sanders & Hillary.
Did I suggest that the establishment overhaul would be by socialists?
No…I did. As a political scientist son, I went a little further.
You will have to explain what a “political scientist son” is before we can proceed.
If it’s done outside the parameters of the Constitution, what it won’t be is American! In any case you are a Sanders supporter, I rest my case!
“Logical consequences are the Scarecrows of Fools and the Beacons of Wise Men!” Thomas Huxley
One of the things that most needs overhauling is the electoral system so that you do not have incumbents from the two parties that are voted in again and again regardless of how good a job they are doing. You will never get Congress to agree to limit their very cushy jobs, and probably not the states either. In fact, the Constitution is written to be self-perpetuating.
But if enough people – 10s of millions of them – demand a change, Congress might be forced to hold a referendum. That would be American – just not the America of the late 18th century.
In other words, typical of the Leftist attitude, you have more of a right to decide whom is to represent people than they, themselves have. For their own good, of course!!! We already have all the term limits we need, they are called Elections!
If you honestly desire to fix the election process, you should get full force behind Voter ID! Become an active participant in reforming our Immigration Policy! And realistic Campaign Funding reform!
Where did I say, or even suggest that I “have more of a right to decide whom is to represent people than they, themselves have”.
Elections are becoming more and more of a joke, except that the results are far from funny. The two party system means that anyone who wants to run as a democrat or a republican can do so, while any one else must work to get on the ballot, state by state. If you do not belong to one of the major parties, you get no press coverage, and cannot participate in debates. And if you are not the party’s pick – or very obnoxious – you get minimal press coverage and one or two opportunities to speak during debates.
Some people claim that there is fraud (dead people voting, or illegals voting), others say that there is voter suppression (throwing people off the rolls because they have similar names, requiring photo ID), voter intimidation, gerrymandering, and irregularities with the voting machines.
Having just voted for the first time this month, I have to say that I was impressed with the polling station I went to, and the process that got me there. Perhaps you take it so much for granted that you haven’t really thought about how elegant the process is. It starts when you register at the county Board of Elections which requires proof of citizenship. In my case that was a copy of my naturalization certificate – no certificate, no registration. They sent me a voter registration card with a number, my choice of party affiliation (none) and the ward and district where I should vote.
Nearer the election they sent a postcard confirming the time and place for voting. When I turned up I gave my name which was checked off their list, and I was asked to sign against my name (this can then be checked against my proof of citizenship document). I filled out a paper ballot which was then fed into a reader and tallied.
Now tell me, if you want to commit voter fraud, how are you going to do it?
“incumbents…….that are voted in again and again…” It’s Their choice NOT yours! You propose to take that choice away from them, again “For their own good” Get it???
One way, is to gather the names of those recently deceased that were registered at the time of their passing. In the States were NO ID is required all that’s needed is someone, anyone to claim to be the deceased, sign the persons name and vote! I could have done that myself when my Father passed away just days before the election in 2012. No ID is required in Illinois! Admittedly it’s cumbersome and not without risk in certain smaller towns. However in major cities it’s easy and where the vote is close, possibly effective!
Just as one can sign on someone else’s credit card. But you usually get caught.
Are you saying that it is the incumbents choice? If so I agree with you.
I was trying to say that incumbents have a considerable advantage over newcomers because of their built-in name recognition, better the devil you know etc, the ability to campaign while on the job, more media coverage, and lobbyists. That is a lot to overcome.
While it is, of course the incumbents choice, it is also the electorates choice. What you are in effect saying by creating term limits is, “we know you are wrong to vote for this person again, but given you are too stupid to understand that, we will decide for you, for your own good! Aren’t we wonderful?”
“That is a lot to overcome”, indeed it is, YET it has been being done over and over and over again since 1789! Including in 2016!
I can see no connection between term limits and the stupidity of voters.
Are you for real????
If you didn’t question the intellect of the electorate to make their own election decisions, why the he_ _ would you you chose to take it out of their hands through Term Limits???
Well, Ted, the way I look at it is that being a member of Congress, in either house, is service to country, NOT a cushy career.
There is also the consideration of money. Probably the biggest problem in Washington is that far to many politicians have taken hefty campaign donations and the donors expect favors in return. With the implied threat that if those favors are not forthcoming, there will be no donations to the re-election campaign. With no re-election possible, the special interests have no power over the politician. Personally I think that is a very good thing.
Your assessment was, once accurate. Not today! Originally, serving in our Government was considered an obligation to any competent to the tasks. The …pay(?) was just at, or just below subsistence levels, no lifetime retirement funding, No possibility of a lucrative position as a Lobbyist after service!
As Hillary, though she isn’t, by a very long way, the only one, proves there are myriad ways members of Congress can leverage their position into a healthy bank account, outside the legal political contributions!
If you and I can see the problem as you describe it, there are many, many other as well, It’s incumbent on us to get the message out! We need to blow through all the rhetoric! Idealistic(?) perhaps but it is the ONLY way we preserve our Country and it’s original principles! The current exposing of the complicity of the media, is a major step in the right direction!
Anybody that makes voting decisions, based on Television Commertials, or Party Rhetoric, is a complete fool, and should do themselves and their country a favor and obstain from voting until they educate themselves, AT THE LIBRARY not the Internet!
Glory hallelujah! We have actually got to the point of agreeing on something.
Your last paragraph in particular is very relevant. Benjamin Franklin instituted public schools in Philadelphia precisely so that the people would become educated voters. I am all in favor of books, they form the core of my life (avid reader, bookbinder, restorer, collector, seller, editor and writer). They have the advantage of time – the time it takes to research and write, to edit and to read. All that time allows for reflection and assessment.
That said, the internet is an incredibly powerful tool. One just has to hope that people have gained enough education from books to be able to assess the information presented.
Indeed the internet has alerted me, quickly, to issues I was unaware of, after a brief search on the internet, I head to the Library to do any substantive research!
The whore is that Trump Harlot & their kid IS AUTISTIC. He’s a dufus.
You sure are full of hate eh. Please take a chill pill.
Fuck off and die. How dare you spew the vitriol that Rosie O’Dnel diagnosed by looking at the boy?? Slime like you should banished from the internet! Picking on a 10 year old is truly beyond the pale. You are a hater, and a fat pig, too!
Did you like your Trump shitburger? Do you regard it as a delicacy? Well, eat this while you savour your burger, The kid’s a D…U…F…U…S! I’ll fuck you & you die, you deplorable “ugly” bitch!
Fuck you & shit like you, bitch!
AAAAahhahahaa!! You should see me, bozo! And yep, any stand taken against the left is a step in the right direction. I’d shoot you in the eye before you would ever get your grubby meathooks on me.
Exactly…I just get her dissing common sense stuff.
Who’s the crybaby?
Respectfully Marine, thank you for your service!
WHERE do you see any “back-stabbing” with respect to Romney? He was perfectly upfront with his opposition to Trumps candidacy! He was “in your face” not a back-stabber!
Oh it’s the Hillary WHORE. She’s back. She’s trolling and she’s desperate for money. Elizabeth the WHORE.
I wish that I was paid to comment. I’d be quite rich by now, but it is all on my own time.
I’d just love to give it to the Trump slut.
go melt into the swamp with the rest of the slime. Man look at those hog jowels on this scum > Have you seen your toes lately, pig.
You are too fat and ugly! Probably stroke you out. ppftt!
There you are again showing your stupidity. Your IQ must be around 40 or 50. Gingrich and Huckabee also want to “Make This Country Great Again”
Back under the rock Elizabeth, here comes the frog again.
Uh? I’m afraid that my IQ of around 40 or 50 (give to take 90) is not enough to understand your frog reference.
Exactly what I thought early this year. Nothing but kissing Ass.
I’m not sure what you mean as the one thing I can say about Trump is that he does to kiss ass – at least not in the sense you mean. Literally? who knows?
Stop screaming
Go take up knitting. If you can’t read all caps, quit reading. You have that right. Obviously you need a life if All caps are unacceptable to you.
All caps is lazy and not acceptable online. Grow up.
SAYS YOU? WHO CARES?
Refreshing if you grow up and expand your world. You obviously need it.
So r u, so what am I. As I said and as u demo, grow up
U grow up.
Cannot hear you
It looks like Agapao13, me, and a couple of others care. Otherwise we wouldn’t say anything. I actually wouldn’t have said anything until you and Wiley Venable went off on Katrina because she said something about this. Normally, I just don’t read all caps posts and just skip over them just like I would do if a post was in a foreign language.
True. We sometimes don’t like how others express themselves. Simply, I think it’s a venue to blow off steam and vent. That’s how I guess I see it. Seeing things we can not do anything about is frustrating. We have a choice not to respond. Ideally we defend the right for one to express themselves. Thanks for your reply.
You are correct. It is not acceptable, but some people just don’t care if they use a rude style of typing. I would rather see someone use no caps at all rather than all caps because they are hard for me to read
ROMNEY is just a loser. He is disrespectful in America as well as abroad. We don’t want this arrogant loser.
Just remember, readers,this comes from a dumb racist deplorable.
Artuuuurro, U don’t deserve a reply on that…
Where was Romney ever disrespectful to America???
You must have missed it. Europeans can’t stand him. He insulted by his arrogance and speaking as an American. He is unlikely and unwanted by our allies as by Americans.
Don’t look now, BUT the same can be said of Trump, depending on whom you query! That’s to be expected given they are largely Social Democracies! In any case it’s NOT up to them! They do not and should not dictate how our government is constructed! That’s Obama’s legacy!
Wrong. Just returned from Europe and not even close to your observation. I Talked to many in these countries. Obama not highly regarded, either. Only realistic answer to how OBAMA ever got elected, voter fraud. DEAD PEOPLE VOTING. Investors confident
with Donald Trump presidentcy.
Yeah, Trump should elect a true deplorable.
Count me in. ??
True American OR a Trump loyalist?
I believe that Trump is doing so because of they are business guys. That is, they know what & when is show & not. Obviously, the establishment doesn’t.
If Romney is dumb enough to buy in to Mormonism, he is not qualified to hold ANY office.
People can say the same thing about your religion. Your comment I find to be ‘below the belt’ and not relevant
He’s just jealous cause he’s ugly & he’s gay. His dream is to have a baby come out his ass.
Who is ugly and gay? What is he jealous of? And who dreams of having a baby come out of his ass? (whatever that may mean).
You are making a fool of yourself.
And not for the first time either!!!
True
I tend to agree with this article.
I think Newt Gingrich, should be asked to serve as Sec of State
so, obviously does Newt! He would, I believe be adequate, However Romney would be much better!
Ask him over for a three-some. Your wife’ll love him, that self-righteous asshole. I hear he likes it up the ass & that he covets whores dressed as clergy. He himself is called, “Sister Shooby.”
While I agree with you, Arturo, that Newt Gingrich is not a great choice for SOS, I find your justification offensive. I find it offensive because you are making these accusations with absolutely no justification. There are much better – and demonstrable – reasons to not approve of Newt.
Please don’t encourage this poor sad soul! Not that any encouragement is needed. He’s never offered the first substantive response to anything, best to ignore the poor sad soul!
You may be right. But I am a non-religious evangelical, and I hold out hope that I may be able to save a few “souls”. Or at least drum some sense into their thick skulls.
Consider Ron White’s observance!
I was not familiar with Ron White until just now when I looked him up. He’s quite funny.
But I don’t get your reference.
Ron White did a routine he labeled “You can’t fix Stupid” It’s on a par with Bill Engvall’s “Here’s your sign”.
I’ll check them out.
OK they are really funny and they make me rethink my preconceived notion that conservatives do not have a sense of humor.
It’s only the horrific conditions of these past 8 years that make many of us appear to be the Cruise Directors on the Titanic, or as if we were weened on pickles! The next few years should see marked improvement in our attitudes!
Horrific conditions? really? Perhaps I have been asleep, but I have not noticed horrific conditions.
can you elaborate?
Are you serious?!?!
An economy literally on life support, in spite of the fact that our debt load has been expanded, in only 8 years by an amount that it took 43 other Presidents 227 years to amass. A labor participation rate unseen since the Great Depression. A Country tearing itself apart along almost every possible line, Age, Gender, Ethnicity, Education, Religion, Sexual Orientation. Our Law Enforcement organizations under siege, our institutions of higher Education(?) anti-American. Our military depleted. our influence on the national stage faltering. The Middle East and North Africa in flames. All this and much more orchestrated, and perpetuated from the White House!
I’ve been actively involved in politics since 1968, NEVER have I experienced a more corrupt and divisive administration than that of Obama!
The country is indeed being torn apart, but I fail to see how you can blame that on Obama.
Our law enforcement organizations amy well be under siege, possibly because this is increasingly becoming a police state, and many of the citizens object to that.
Anti-American higher education? Really? You will have to explain that further.
The US military is still the largest and strongest that the world has ever known. Is this a good thing? I don’t think so. Our Department of Defense is misnamed. It is in fact the Department of Offense. And, in my opinion, the US never met a war it did’t like. The ONLY redeeming feature of a potential Trump presidency is that he is not a war hawk. That said, he wouldn’t mind dropping the off nuclear bomb. God help us.
I have to ask. Is it really that important for the US to be the most influential nation on earth?
My Lord Elizabeth, You are blind AND stupid. Get back under the rock , quick before the Frog knows you are out in the open.
Your Lord indeed. Do you actually have anything relevant to say?
I think so. Otherwise I would not be commenting. The frog? Is that actually relevant?
The point I think he’s making is that most of the problems were on Obama’s administration. I agree completely.
while I am always thrilled to have people agree with me, in this case I am not sure what we are agreeing on.
I don’t think that the US should be the most influential nation ( that should be Leichtenstein),
and of course you are right about all the rest. The little boys and girls attending college should not be forced to take exams while they are stressed from the electoral process and the Department of Defense should be reduced to a company of girl scouts that were once boy scouts but what with the transgender arrangement have been emasculated. If you don’t want to bake cakes for odd weddings you should be hung, and nigs should be allowed to shoot those bastard cops at will while their friends do their casual shopping. Great analysis on your part.
I LOVE IT! Lichtenstein. Well why not?
For the rest….
Have I actually mentioned odd weddings, nigs, or college?
However, I am happy to discuss all of those if you like.
It has been my experience that liberals do not “discuss” anything. They typically spew bullshit while grinning, and when presented with facts they change the subject, but thanks for your offer.
Go on. I dare you! State conversation.
Color books and crayons for college. Lizzie likes that.
Not really.
Yes, I would like a Playboy mag.
You must be kidding!!!
The assault on Law Enforcement was initiated in June of 2009, when Obama, unofficially, sanctioned it with the astonishing pronouncement, “The Police acted stupidly”!! He purposefully reinforced that position many times since then, Travon Martin, Ferguson, Baltimore, ect.!
Pro-American speech is classed as “hate speech” on many Campus’s, and restricted to tiny “Free Speech Zones”! ANYWHERE on American soil IS and always should be, a Free Speech Zone!!! Educational Institutes have begun refusing to fly the American Flag! SERIOUSLY???
Were you to read Article VIII, you would discover that 8 of the 19 Clauses there, relate to our Military and National Defense. Far and away the most addressed issue in the Article that lists the Congressional mandates! What’s NOT found there is ANY authorization for Federal Welfare, Federal Education, Federal involvement in Marriages, and on and on and on, encompassing nearly the entire Progressive agenda!
Obama’s purge of our Military Command Structure includes nearly 400 Flag Ranked Officers and thousands of Senior NCO’s, that refused to bow and kiss his….ring(?)! We have a head of our Joint Chiefs, that has NEVER held a Combat Command! The Military is so degraded that it can no longer conduct a two front campaign! Should hostilities breakout in the near future we will be in serious trouble. Perhaps you haven’t noticed but China, very quietly, has increased it’s Military by over 400%. Do you suppose they did that so their Parades will be more impressive?
YES, and YES it is important that we are the most influential nation! Unless, that is, you desire to be controlled by a Dictatorship! Besides, if you are not the lead dog in the pack, the view never changes, and it’s not particularly picturesque!
No, I am not kidding. You have not given any reason why the US needs to be the most influential nation other than to say that is it is not is will a dictatorship. Interesting concept. Are you actually saying that the 198 nations that are not the US – and number one – are all dictatorships? That would surprise quite a few of them.
Yes the President said that the police in Cambridge acted stupidly when they arrested a man for trying to get into his own house, with the help of his taxi driver. He was quite right: it was a very badly managed response on the part of the police. Trayvon Martin did not involve the police directly. The police in Ferguson and Baltimore also acted rashly? thoughtlessly? I’m not sure how to put it, but the situations were started by police actions. You are suggesting that the President somehow used those very tense situations to deliberately promote an assault on law enforcement. Not that I saw.
A quick search for “college refuses to fly American flag” showed that Hampshire College did for a while cease flying any flags, following an incident of flag burning. Apparently that is the only case, and it was temporary.
I would read Article VIII, but I can’t find it. My copy of the Constitution stops at Article VII.
But, no, the Constitution does not cover things like Welfare, Education and Marriage. I happen to think that perhaps it should.
AGAIN….SERIOUSLY????
198 nations??? I’m sure Azerbaijan will be the one to step into the position vacated by Obama!! Currently, given the astonishingly, idiotic actions of Angela Merkel, who otherwise would have been the one to fill that void, Putin has assumed that position! The Gate incident didn’t happen as you depict. The Cambridge police were CALLED by Gates neighbor, believing someone was breaking into the Gates home. Upon arriving the police observed Gates, who had apparently forgotten his key, attempting to literally ‘break-in’ . They ask him for an ID and he became obtuse and belligerent! His arrest was due to HIS own idiotic, narcissistic actions!
All that notwithstanding, it should have gone unnoticed by the President of the United States, Well, well outside his authority!! Again read Article II!
You once stated that you were a Naturalized Citizen! I would say , sincerely, welcome. However from your posts, it seems you came here under a misunderstanding! We are not now, nor, even if my life is required, will we ever be a Socialism! If, as your posts convey, that is the type of government you prefer there are other, better , from that perspective, choices!
A Central Government, is a necessary Evil! As such it must always be kept firmly within the boundaries of the Constitution!!!
Yes, Ted, 198 nations. The entire world is in agreement that there are serious problems with the environment, and these pesky floods and droughts and wildfires and dried up lakes and polluted rivers, and ocean acidification and stuff like that.
Not sure what a Socialism is, but I can guess.
Understandable, that they should, as I said Global Climate Change is a given. They, and we, would be better served were they to focus on what actions are necessary to compensate for the unavoidable results of events that have reoccurred, cyclically for at least 250 million years! Mankind has been responsible for exactly NONE of the five, known, major extinction events earth has experienced! Mankind is not responsible for any that will inevitably occur in the future, Unless, in an act of abject stupidity, we should engage in a Thermonuclear War, then all bets are off.
Of course mankind had nothing to do with past extinctions: they all occurred long before we came into existence.
However, if you think that mankind is not responsible for the current emerging extinction you have your head very firmly in the sand. There are none so blind as those who would not see, and obviously you do not want to see.
Mankind has trashed the planet. We can probably save our civilization but it will take a huge change in the mindset of westerners. Business as usual very likely means the end of life as we know it.
Absolutely Unbelievable!!!
You are either monumentally naive, or woefully uninformed here!!!
Are you unaware that these SAME organizations, NASA, American Meteorological Society, etc. and SAME individuals, Dr. James Hansen, John Holdren (Obama’s ….science Czar{?}), in the 1970’s attempted This SAME disingenuous scam??? The only variation this time is they are claiming Anthropogenic Global Warming. In the ’70’s’ it was Anthropogenic Global Cooling, IE: “The New Ice Age” !
Same degree of certainty, Same idiot creating the computer modeling (Dr. Hansen), similar volume of “peer reviewed studies” ALL guaranteeing if we did not wean ourselves off petroleum products millions would starve, again due to the inability to produce crops, only that time due to cold temperatures! In fact they claimed if we did not reduce our consumption, New York City would be under an ice sheet a half a mile thick by now!
This is about control alright, Control of our Economy through the hi-jacking of our Energy industries!
Yes, I am unaware that NASA and James Hansen promoted goal cooling. NASA also seems unaware: http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/GISSTemperature/giss_temperature2.php?src=share
Let’s just suppose for a moment that you are the one who is well-informed (I’d love to know where you get your information) and that this anthropogenic stuff is a scam. How does that work? Has NASA hi-jacked our Energy industries? Does Dr Hansen control the economy?
Have you actually thought this through? Who benefits from the hoax? And how?
I suggest that you consider the possibility that the fossil fuel industry, in an attempt to protect their considerable investments in R&D and infrastructure, could be spreading misinformation.
Mind boggling!!!
“Who benefits from the hoax”?!?!?!
Well, gee lets just see. Given that Energy, the cost of it, impacts virtually EVERY single aspect of our economy, whomever controls that cost, either directly, by ownership or indirectly, through regulatory policy, OWNS the economy! Sadly you are involved in a high stakes game of Chess and you are using Checker Strategy!
So are you saying that NASA owns the economy?
Come on now!! The Government owns NASA, as displayed by the fact that Obama all but scrapped our Manned Space Flights, forcing us to hitch rides into space with…..wait for it…..the Russians! Essentially he’s turned NASA into the largest, most expensive, Muslim welcoming organization on the planet!
You will find that EVERY Scientist(?), read political Prostitute, to espouse the nonsense of Anthropogenic Climate Change is “Grant Funded” ! The Scientists that are giving an honest assessment of Climate Change are NOT!
Obviously NASA is a government agency, but I do not follow your logic with the rest of your rant against NASA. I think you are referring to getting to the ISS when you talk about hitching a ride with the Russians, but you are overlooking the fact that it is the INTERNATIONAL Space Station which, according to Wikipedia, “is serviced by a variety of visiting spacecraft: the Russian Soyuz and Progress, the American Dragon and Cygnus, the Japanese H-II Transfer Vehicle, and formerly the Space Shuttle and the European Automated Transfer Vehicle. It has been visited by astronauts, cosmonauts and space tourists from 17 different nations”
Do you have some special knowledge that allows you to say NASA is a muslim-welcoming organization?
I have to disagree that “every scientist..to espouse the nonsense of Anthropogenic Climate Change” is funded by government grants, which is, I think, what you were implying. There are many scientists attached to private universities – Cornell comes to mind as it is on my doorstep, so to speak, and I have heard many scientists from there speak – and there are many thousands of scientists in other countries who have come to the same conclusion.namely that man is entirely to blame for the f***ked up state of the environment. Climate change is just a symptom of a mush more serious problem. Are they also political prostitutes?
The Space Station is only one possible destination for manned space flight, however the fact that the Station is International, should have NOTHING to do with how we get there!
In 2010, June or July I believe it was, Charles Bolden Administrater of NASA, during an interview with……wait for it…..Al-Jazeera, stated that upon being appointed the administrater of NASA, Obama assigned him three primary tasks: To inspire children towards Math and Science. – To expand inter national relationships and, “Perhaps foremost, he wanted me to reachout to the Muslim World and engage much more with dominant Muslim nations to help them ‘feel good’…..”
Cornell is just another piece of little Jimmy Carters monstrous creation , the Department of Indoctrination, mislabeled ‘education'(?)! As long as they accept Tax Payer Money they are bound to bow to the Administration!
Try researching the findings at Institutes of REAL education, that reject ANY public funding, such as Hillsdale College or the Wyoming Catholic College!
Al Jazeera is one of the finest news organizations in the world. Their coverage is truly international and impartial. It is NOT a voice of Islam. Most of what you say about th Bolden interview is accurate, but you stopped short of a few key words: to help them (Muslim nations) ‘feel good’…..ABOUT THEIR HISTORIC CONTRIBUTION TO SCIENCE.
What is wrong with hitching a ride? The Russian and American astronauts were going to spend months together in a fairly confined space. Who cares how they got there?
Cornell University was founded in 1865, more than 100 years before Jimmy Carter became President. Which book in the library told you that he had funneled taxpayer money to Cornell? Which book told you that the administration tells Cornell what to do, and what to teach? Private universities tend to be funded by their endowments rather than the government. Cornell is not exception.
Awww…poor baby, somebody took your rattle away…boo-hoo. Where are the facts? The facts pt. to the success of America with Obama at the helm. You blame the Re-Pubes like Bush, remember him, you skipped him.1968, shit you must read just tabloids all this time.
Do the leftists really not realize all those facts? Good summation of where Obamma administration is leaving this country.
National debt
While I agree that the country should balance its budget just as families, corporations and institutions should, has the debt actually affected you on a personal level? Is it the wost thing that you can imagine?
No it probably has not effected me personally, but that does not mean it won’t! It will have to be paid back at some point. Which will effect all Americans and Americans not yet born. Taxes will have to be raised even higher! Right now we are only paying the interest if even that.
So, what if we taxed the top 5% at an equitable rate? Do you have a problem with that? (Full disclosure: I fall in that range) What if we cut the defense (offense) budget in half? We could pay off the debt and have money to spare.
The ship hit the iceberg 11-8. You elected a fascist. I’ll wait for Hell to freeze over. I doubt it’ll improve, but go ahead & dream.
I’m ok. I’m just appalled at the people’s choice for POTUS. Utterly appalled. This presidemcy is bogus. The tabloids are the source of these people’s belief systems? Pleeeez, Give me a break. Steve B., the alt-right??? That’s ridiculous. America, I’m disgusted. Fuck you all, & keep up your charade, you deplorable idiots!
Well! That is a surprise. I, too, am appalled by the people choice for POTUS, but your previous comments did not suggest that you felt that way.
I agree. I’m a tabloid.
Well, you said it.
He would need to know the legitimate reasons.
Who would need to know? What legitimate reasons?
You fat pig jowels face . You are a real pig. I am shocked that this site would publish your crap. Both of you are disgusting
Shut the fuck up, Bobby…ooohhh, You deplorable sack a shit! Schmit is it? You fascist Hitler Trump chump!
And thinking about it. Normal folks don’t even think about those things. You are obviously involved in that stuff or you wouldn’t think it , let alone say such garbage. You really are a scum bag arturo
NO. Someone FRESH. Not these same ol swamp rats. it was promised!
VOMIT !!!!
You only have a like because you like your own post. I believe that is sort of conceited. I don’t care if anyone likes my posts. It doesn’t thrill me at all.
SO PEOPLE WILL HEAR ME!
So we will not pay attention to your posts. Learn online etiqette.
One chooses what to read and not. Censorship is certainly not your job. I like Stans posts. Yours are inane and banal, yes even anal.
I also like Stan’s post “SO PEOPLE WILL HEAR ME”. That made me chuckle. I just wish that he something of value to say.
If that were the case he’d have no need of capital letters!
Agreed!
You could also say so that people won’t read you posts. I normally don’t, but since this one only had five words, I forced myself to read it.
mistake number one, Romney does not deserve such a huge job, he is not loyal, and will embarrass our country further from what Bitch Hillary did. that crooked dishonest corrupted bitch sold our country, I wouldn’t expect anything else from that guy. Mr. Trump do not do it… it will be regrettable, you have much better people in line than this already known double crosser.
I like Romney…he is just a very bad guy to trust. Establishment to the nth degree; just like Newt. That is why I am befuddled why he’s considered for a ‘top’ Cabinet position.
Agree with you. Voters made it clear in last elections we do not want ROMNEY!!!
Trump is not the casting director for a movie. Romney is said to look the part??? Trump can’t be serious.
Easy does it! Mr. T has a lifetime of experience to pick the RIGHT people. He isn’t naive when it comes to honor and loyalty! He also understands how to bring people into a bigger tent! There is an army watching his back both civil and military! Remember- It’s not about one guy!
Yeah, like David B. Sic Heil! Sic Heil! Sic Heil! Sick Hell!
what the he_ _ is a “Sic Heil”???
Actually, what the Germans said in WWII was Seig Heil, which in German means hail victory. It was not really a bad thing for people who were at war to say, but I suppose it became a bad thing because the Nazis said it. If they said it in English, no one would care, but I guess the Germans like to speak German.
THERE ARE OTHERS BESIDES GINGRICH AND HUCKABEE TO BE CHOSEN,WHY LIMIT IT TO THEM? I AM SURE THERE ARE MORE THAN ENOUGH QUALIFIED PEOPLE THAT CAN ASSUME THE POSITION.
AGA, WHO SAYS I AM SCREAMING? JUST BECAUSE I CHOOSE TO USE UPPERCASE TO LOWERCASE ? GET A LIFE ,IF YOU DO NOT LIKE UPPERCASE,DON’T READ IT. I DO NOT FOLLOW THE FLOCK LIKE LITTLE SHEEP,JUST BECAUSE SOMEONE SAYS TO DO WHAT THEY WANT YOU TO DO,DOES NOT MEAN YOU HAVE TO. TAKE UP YOUR OWN ROAD INSTEAD OF FOLLOWING ALL THE REST OF THE FLOCK. THAT IS WHAT FREEDOM IS ALL ABOUT! HAVE A GREAT DAY.
THERE YOU GO AGA,YOU ARE LEARNING ALREADY. DON’T DO WHAT YOU DO NOT WANT TO DO,AND YOU WILL BE HAPPIER FOR IT!
Hey,Romney for NOT ANYTHING…the tables would turn for those of us who rigorously supported Trumps earlier views…and, they remain mine.
The tried-true thinkers would agree….evn an open apology wouldn’t satisfy me…it was still “from the heart at the time” so don’t open this can of worms now..again.
Bolton, Giuliani, another Mil. General- – put the thnking cap back on….
America MUST return its strong view to Military recovery so bad, it hurts me to think..
Hooooha here!
Who let you out your grave, you fossil?
The bottom line is Trump will not choose Romney, and a negotiated APOLOGY is just that, there’s no feeling behind it, if he wanted to REALLY offer one he would of done so along time ago… Time to move on.
Trump suggested he would ask Mitt R. to be sec. of state, so who asked you Viet Boy?
Arturo, I agree with you!! Who’d have thought it. Romney did not push himself forward. Trump seems to want him.
Actually, it’s none of your business… Buy the way, are you a guy or a girl, God that picture!
The ‘apology’ requirement is wholly adolescent!! This isn’t, or dam_ well shouldn’t be about what Romney deserves, but about what America deserves! For Her future that is unquestionably Romney as Secretary of State!
Ted, I respectively disagree, there are far better candidates out there I’m sure, but I firmly believe he will not choose Romney.
Understood. Who would you suggest? I believe that Newt, though he lacks executive experience, or Rudy would be adequate, but Romney is the best I can find!
Newt would be one good choice, but I think Trump should expand his search for now.
I have a couple of problems with Romney. I also believe that one of these problems resolves questions raised by the other problem. Here it is: Romney clearly showed his alliance to the NWO gang when he began preaching about “climate change”. Bad, sign!! This then begins to POSSIBLY make sense out of his disappearance during the debates with Obama in 2012. If he is an agent for the NWO it would then raise his loss to Obama during the debates from inexplicable to easily understood. Just because I’m paranoid doesn’t mean there isn’t somebody out to get me.
It’s hard to know where to begin a discussion with someone who thinks that the NWO “gang” is real but climate change is not.
Climate Change is very real. Indeed it is a proven fact, has been so for at least 250 Million years! Initially explained by Isaac Newton and Leonhard Euler in 1755! Neutations, Chandlers Wobble, Milankovitch Cycles!
What isn’t real is Anthropogenic Climate Change, that is a political creation intended to hi-jack our Economy through control of our Energy Industry!
Well, Ted, let me ask you this. Would you agree that man has had a fairly dramatic impact on the planet? We have, after all, been cutting down trees for several thousand years; we have dammed and diverted rivers; we have polluted the air and the water on which we depend; we have driven many species to extinction by destroying their habitat; we have developed (and used) weapons of mass destruction that have left many areas uninhabitable; we have squandered natural resources and we have bred uncontrollably.
In deed we have, not all for the worse, however. Agreed, many mistakes have been and are still being made, hopefully we will get better. All that notwithstanding just ONE extraterrestrial impact, or major Volcanic event outweighs hundreds of years of human activity. This planet is much more durable than all that!
Should we ever engage in a Nuclear War, all bet are off however! that one human activity alone has the power to permanently impact the global climate!
My point, Ted, was that humans have have a significant, even catastrophic impact on the planet. The planet will survive, but will we?
I can accept the term “significant” but completely reject the term catastrophic”, as I said that will occur only with Global Nuclear War! And man and of course the eternal Cockroach will survive even that, though I certainly don’t want to be one!
You don’t want to be a cockroach? I don’t know anyone who does.
BUT. If nothing changes, the chances are that the next dominant species on earth will be the cockroach. Man is too clever to let that happen, but too many “men” don’t see that they have to change direction in order to survive.
That first sentence is beneath you!
Change is the only given in life. The challenge is when, where, how, and how much to change! The ….change(?) paraded by Obama and the Progressives is the proverbial Horse of a Different Color, a VERY different color! It’s to be resisted by all means necessary!
Ted, I was not the one to bring up cockroaches.
Politics is always about change. What other platform is there?
Why is change to be resisted by all means necessary? Are you saying that the world in 2016 is so wonderful that nothing needs to change, ever?
It does not matter who brought up Cockroaches, WDC is full of them and they are power hungry as well as money.
Huh? What do you mean? What is WDC?
“they are power hungry as well as money.” ??????????
Our US capital full of elected and Lobbyist.
That comment is as obscure as the previous ones. What do you mean?
Now wait a minute , there are also women involved with the climate change push. There is one step that could be taken to help out and that is NO Drivers license until 18 and a Graduate of High School.Just think of all the gas and oil that would be saved . Millions less cars on the roads and School busses would be full instead of nearly empty.
There are indeed many women involved with the climate change push. I would not be surprised to find that there are many more women than men. That was kind of my point: men are the ones that are resisting the idea.
Where I grew up, one had to be 18 to get a drivers license. I have no problem with that. Perhaps we should go even further and make the driving age 21. After all, if one cannot be trusted to have a beer with one’s mates until one’s 22nd year, why should one allowed to drive?
No argument on that . I take it you are from the EU were 18 is the norm.
No actually, I grew up in South Africa. In the UK one can get a license at 16. I’m not sure about the rest of the EU.
So that is where you learned English I take it. I have a banker that Grew up in England that has not lost the accent and is great to listen to.
The Queen’s English is a great language.
That had been my guess for a while, the way you were educated shows in the writing.
I take that as a compliment
You got that one right.
Yes. I grew up speaking the Queen’s English with a smattering of South Africanisms thrown in. I now speak english, American, South African and Australian as well as several other european languages.
I lived in southern Germany for many years and was witness to south African ladies visiting the ski towns in our winter. They frequently were seen misbehaving.
Oh dear. Oh my. And that says what, exactly?
The drinking age was 18 for several years. It may still be 18 in some states. I think that New York had an 18 year drinking age when most of the other states were 21. I don’t know what it is there now because I haven’t been there for quite a few years. I usually don’t get asked for ID anyway. Actually, I was asked for ID at a Safeway store while in my early 50s, but that may have been a joke. I’ve certainly never looked any younger than I am, which will be 76 in a couple of weeks.
It has been 21 in New York since 1985 (up from 19). The state has relaxed quite a bit in recent years, but still has some of the craziest laws regarding alcohol.
Having lived in South Africa and Europe prior to coming to the States, I get the impression that the US never really got over the puritanical basis for Prohibition.
Elizabeth, you dumb shit. The earth’s climate has changed frequently in the 645843 million years we have been contemplating it. It will continue to change even after Al Gore is dead and buried. If you need real change, then you must speak with the billions of Chinese and billions of Indians (east). Now please take your medications and go to sleep, stuff will look better when you wake up.
I was about to go to sleep, but unfortunately when I wake up there will still be “dumb shits” who think that the world is 645843 million years old. Where did you get that number?
Yes. The climate has been changing since there was a climate, but the changes have been on a geologic time scale. Never before have there been changes as rapid and dramatic as has happened in the past 250 years.
I got the number from the same place that most liberals get their “information” Remember CHINESE and INDIANS, send them an email
By most definitions I am a liberal, but try as I might, I cannot find any reference to your very particular number. not even close.
And I am at a loss to know what Chinese and Indians have to do with the age of the earth. I would send them an email, but I don’t know what to say.
Elizabeth, Elizabeth, where do most liberals get their information? (Hint the source is closer to the back of the head than the front). The Chinks and the Indians have absolutely nothing todo with the earth’s age
but there are so many of them that most of the pollution comes from there except at any location where any Clintons, Obamas, or other liberal democrats might be resting. If you send them an email just wish
them happy holidays or something like that (NO MENTION OF THE WORD CHRISTMAS)
I get it now. You made up the age of the earth, and you are suggesting that “liberals” get their information from flatulence. It took me a while because I had always assumed that part of being liberal was reading widely, assessing what you read and only assimilating information that has a pretty good chance of being correct.
You, quite clearly, are not a liberal.
Ok, we have gotten there. Now what?
We could start with you apologizing for calling me a dumb shit. Then we could look at where you got your information that “the Chinks and the Indians” produce most of the pollution; and why you think anyone would dream of including the word Christmas in a communication with either country.
OK, I apologize. The C’s and the I’s produce most of the pollution simply because there are so many of them. No “Christmas” in your email to be
politically correct. Christmas has been outlawed and changed to “Happy Holidays.
Stay calm, take your psycho meds & go to bed.
Why choose a snake in the grass? The past has dictated the man cannot be trusted, so why put him in a position of trust where he could undermine, or worse, the redirect what the PEOPLE voted to go in? We have enough back stabber in high positions. We do not need to form a conspiracy-abled group.
Where do you see any Back-stabbing from Romney? He was perfectly upfront in his criticism of candidate Trump. A “back-stabber” is one who pretends to support while working behind the scenes to undermine! Your attitude is adolescent and counterproductive to America’s future!
Golly. Guess I’m in good company. ROMNEY is just a loser nobody wants. No brainer why he couldn’t beat OBAMA in the last election.
BAD CALL THE MORMANS WILL VOTE TRUMP ANYWAY. THEIR ONLY OTHER CHOICE IS THE DEMON CRAT PARTY THAT KICKED GOD OUT. CAPS IS FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED. WE ALMOST LOST OUR COUNTRY WITH A LONG WAY BACK AND PEOPLE ARE OBSESSED WITH PRINT SIZE.
I’m surprised to see such pettiness from Mike, sadly it might be religious bigotry! In Newts case he’s probably lobbing for the job himself! Whatever the case, we’d better end this third grade pettiness and consider what is best for the Nation, and that is unquestionably Romney!
Remember Kissinger?
Nixon’s pick?
Remember Spiro Agnew?
Nixon’s pick.
Surprised?
Remember Huckabee said on National TV during the 2008 Presidential campaign he said of Romney’s religion the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints he Huckabee said I am not sure they are even Christians. How hypocritical Huckabee is at his comments of Mitt Romney then and the rhetoric continues I wonder if Romney’s choice of religion is still an issue Huckabee and with the Republican Elite in Washington still.
I don’t really care that Romney is a Mormon, but many Christian churches do not consider Mormons to be Christians. When I hear about the golden plates that Joseph Smith found and translated and then they disappeared, it would make me wonder. Although I consider Mormons to be fine people, I’ve always thought that Joseph Smith was the L. Ron Hubbard of his day. South park had a couple of pretty good shows about about the LDS church and Scientology that seemed to be fairly factual.
Well I do very much favor Newt Gingrich . I also like Rudy and some of the others being considered. But NOT THAT ASSHOLE Mitt Romney. He did everything he could to subvert Trump and I am frankly surprised that Trump is even talking to the ASSHOLE. If he does I will still like Trump but not as much as I have been
Those 2 are die-hard establishment. It is fully expected that they are against this. Anyways, they both have their own problems to fix.
Romney needs to be put out to pasture! No Position for Romney! None! Notta!
Notta? That’s a new one.
Old school
Really? Which old school?
Home Schooled, self taught
Aah. So I should not expect to find notta in many dictionaries.
It would be a terrible mistake to include Mitt romney in the Donald Trump administration. Mitt is not Donald Trump’s friend and sooner or later will intentionally hurt him. He has not changed his RINO stripes and is in fact a liberal democrat not to be trusted.
Lorraine E. who would you choose Hillary Clinton
Romney and everyone else he named for this is SWAMP life. Tulsi Gabbard would be good for Sec of State as she is a DIFFERENT kind of Military Dem who is good with people but will take NO Bull, Knows what is going on outside US for many reasons-one being her tours in Iraq and another her knowing how Islam works. Trump should pick Tulsi for Sec of State to show everyone how its really done. I cannot believe his possibles who are all alligators, Corporate, crooks (Guliani GAG, Romney is worse than Kerry, Betrayus belongs under a rock. I thought this was supposed to be Different!)
Gingrich & Huckabee want a True Gauleiter to Serve as Trump’s Secretary of State. Romney is FAR Too Moderate and Rational !!!!!
Moderate and rational are, to my way of thinking, prerequisites for SoS.
Have you noticed that BILL3000 likes all of his own posts?” I don’t know if he likes anyone else’s, but he does like his own.
THAT explains how some indifferent commenters are upgraded so much!
Fortunately, you can only give yourself one up vote.
Don’t even think of putting him up in the Lincoln bed room either!
I agree with Gingrich and Huckabee, Romney is a has been RINO!!!
I agree that Romney should not be considered for the post. While he may have some necessary skills, his bitter and damaging attacks after the question of the nominee had been settled calls into question his ability to function as a team member. Even worse than choosing Romney would be a choice of Corker (R-TN) who aligned with Obama and made the Iran nuclear deal an impossible to stop “done deal”. Both of these men appear to be “globalists”. John Bolton would be a far better choice.
Isn’t this just the best way for PEOTUS to have Romney ‘atone’ for his derogatory and hateful remarks? Just look at the negative remarks from America toward him & should put Romney in his place. Best karma lesson I have ever seen!!! 😉
#NeverRomney He is a back stabbing snake in the grass, and I would HATE for him to follow in the wake of Clinton and Kerry. He is a traitor and unworthy of the honor.
Newt is he man. Can’t trust Romney, not a good choice. I know what he’s thinking, keep your enemy’s close. Don’t do it Trump…
WAY TO GO DAVID,NOW YOUR LEARNING. HAVE A GREAT DAY!
I am sure there are multiple members of the GOP who are qualified to be Secretary of State! Not just these few.
Never Romney for anything…Romney is a failed man.