Previous Story
Major Gun Rights Bill Headed for Republican Congress
Posted On 09 Jan 2017
Conservative voters are counting on Donald Trump and a Republican Congress to protect the Second Amendment, but a new bill from North Carolina Rep. Richard Hudson could indicate a much more aggressive agenda for the 115th Congress. Hudson has introduced a national reciprocity bill that would force every U.S. state to recognize concealed-carry licenses issued in other states – a law that gun-rights groups have wanted for years.
“Your driver’s license works in every state, so why doesn’t your concealed-carry permit?” Hudson asked in a fact sheet accompanying the bill.
The purpose of the bill isn’t necessarily to change local and state laws by federal decree, but rather to prevent situations where gun owners are arrested for unintentionally violating another state’s laws.
It has the support of the NRA, which released a statement approving of Hudson’s legislation.
“Law-abiding citizens should be able to exercise their fundamental right to self-defense while traveling across state lines,” said the organization’s Chris Cox. “This is an extremely important issue to our members and we thank Congressman Hudson for leading the fight to protect our rights.”
This is the second time Hudson has proposed national reciprocity legislation, but his 2015 attempt never made it past committee. The Republican is hopeful that it can make it further with a new man in the White House.
“As a member of President-elect Trump’s Second Amendment Coalition, I look forward to working with my colleagues and the administration to get this legislation across the finish line,” he said.
The bill should have no trouble passing the House, but it could run into problems in the Senate where Republicans have a much slimmer majority. Passing legislation requires 60 votes, and the GOP only has 52 seats under their control. There are a few Democrats who could potentially be persuaded to support a bill like this, but we’ll see. The party is in fight mode right now, so it may be obstruction as far as the eye can see.
Democrats would actually do themselves a big favor by supporting this bill, though. It’s a harmless law and it’s common sense. The party could find a way to support it without dropping their gun control messaging, and it would be an olive branch to gun owners after the disastrous Obama years.
Unfortunately, there’s no indication that Democrats are interested in pulling themselves out of the far-left bubble they’ve built for themselves, so don’t hold your breath.
Liberal heads are exploding 🙂
Probably not get by the federal senate. Takes 60 to do most things. You guys don’t have enough. You can spend money and raise and lower taxes but other things take 60 if you can even get it to the point of a vote.
We going Harry Reid Nuclear, baby!
I understand now that 51 is the majority so it will be passed.
It takes 60 votes for cloture. That will put it on the floor. Some bills take 51 and some take 60 after they get on the floor. Republicans have 52 and Dems 48. If 3 Replicates go with a the Dems they lose. There are at least 3 who could swing on some bills. I don’t know how many it will take for the gun bills but they have to get on the floor. In the house a bill only comes to the floor if Ryan says so. Speaker has more power over his house than Mitchell over the Senate
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S®6 active, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone ——– Original message ——–From: Disqus Date: 1/9/17 5:04 PM (GMT-05:00) To: bbennett42@comcast.net Subject: Re: Comment on Major Gun Rights Bill Headed for Republican Congress
“I understand now that 51 is the majority so it will be passed.”
Settings
A new comment was posted on restoreamericanglory
Rosech Levy
I understand now that 51 is the majority so it will be passed.
5:04 p.m., Monday Jan. 9
|
Other comments by Rosech Levy
Reply
to Rosech Levy
Rosech Levy’s comment is in reply to
Bernadine Bennett:
Probably not get by the federal senate. Takes 60 to do most things. You guys don’t have enough. You can spend money and raise … Read more
You’re receiving this message because you’re signed up to receive notifications about replies to bernadinebennett.
You can unsubscribe
from emails about replies to bernadinebennett
by replying to this email with “unsubscribe”
or reduce the rate with which these emails are sent by
adjusting your notification settings.
Those are the U.S. Senate’s own rules, so now that Republicans hold a majority it is much easier to change the rules so that they can get legislation passed. The Dems blew it big time when they decided to end the 60% or 2/3rds rule. A fundamental constitutional right should not be able to be abridged by anti-gun politicians at the state and even local levels.
Look it’s obvious that you think your rights should be above our right to bear arms but I wouldn’t tell you if I was standing next to you, 1 you wouldn’t know. 2 it’s non of your business if I’m exercising my right to bear arms. This is like tranny’s and bathrooms just couse your dressed like a woman doesn’t give you the right to piss in the same room as my daughter or wife.
I agree with you one hundred percent Mark. To begin with, I personally think that these guys who dress as a female and go through the process of pretending to be something they are not are either screwed up in the head or they are looking for an easy target.
In so much as the gun laws are concerned, I have a permit, but even if I didn’t I would still carry because there are just too many things right now in this country that could cause a riot at any time. I have no intention of being a victim.
Now, that’s telling it as it is….I fully agree!
And there’s something else I’ve been wondering about Artemis. That gender bending law also applies to grade school children. These children are at an age that I don’t serious think have the ability to decide such things as ” I want to be the other gender” Someone had to some how put that in their head because that isn’t normal for children of their age.
I believe Gov. Brown of California had something to do with it because he signed into law that teachers must teach it’s o-k to do these things, so therefore it’s taught in the classroom.
Then there’s the sickies at home behind closed doors doing odd and strange things that the children pick-up on
You already know about the Obama crazy
This world has gone completely nuts. Maybe Mr. Trump can fix at least some of it. Lets hope so.
Liberals are in favor of every type of societal perversion imaginable. That is why liberal teachers and professors are so dangerous in our education system. These people must be put through extremely comprehensive background checks that include psychiatric analysis to protect our most vulnerable citizens from them. That is why “taking control of academia” is one of the planks in the communist agenda. Common Core is just that too. Read the works of a professor named Duke Pesta if you want to know the truth about Common Core. He is a true expert and exposes exactly what Common Core is all about and it isn’t about a “better education” it is about a “liberal education with all of it’s gory details. If you knew the truth you would want to home school your children or use private schools. Public schools promote the liberal war on mankind.
I taught physics for 36 years in a public school and saw three perverted teachers booted. To teach in my state there is a back round check but I’m sure things like this get overlooked and that’s a crime. I also worked part time as a police officer after taking one year of training and class work (most done from 6PM-10PM 3 days a week and on Saturdays). Before I got into the training program I had to take a psychological test called the MMPI and be interviewed by a licensed mental health professional. If there was any hint of psychological issues you could not get into the required training to be in law enforcement.
I don’t think states require the same scrutiny for teachers or at least didn’t years ago. I think there should be before you can even go to college and major in education. I think this would weed out some of the idiots. Now if you could just come up with a way to keep liberals from spouting there bull wouldn’t that be great. I think many of them have psychological issues and of the ones I know several do. My masters is in psychology and when I hear and see what they do this reinforces that opinion.
In the real world employees can be fired for any reason whatsoever. It does not have to be even work related. If your boss doesn’t like the way you dress you can be fired. Most people don’t have the money to sue a company but teachers are protected by unions so no matter what they are accused of the unions fight to protect them. That is the sad state of affairs in education today. The cases of male teachers having sexual affairs with female students is not new and neither is the penalty, instant termination and legal charges filed. However, the cases of female teachers doing the same thing has increased by a lot. Sometimes they are fired and legally punished but that is the exception. Most are probably fired but they don’t do jail time.
You must work in Russia. When I worked as an employee of Pa in law enforcement there was a laborer that was given more second chances than any teacher I ever new. Break equipment and do stupid things were his thing and he is still working there. I worked at a gun shop evenings for about 8-9 years and General Electric workers frequented the shop. They could get their job done in 3-4 hours then could spend the rest of their time in a rec room. Other things guys said that worked other places were just as bad.
Do you know that if a teacher gets charged with a DUI he loses his job and his retirement. Do you. If a cop in the state system does the same the result.is the same.
In the real world half of the folks with jobs don’t do shit. My wife worked at Sears and they are now going down the tube because many of the employees did not show up for work, stole things and in general were lazy. I could go on and on but I think you get the idea. If there is a teacher that gets away with some of the things you say then that’s the problem the overpaid school principals and superintendent failed to address. To say the things about the millions of teachers that bust their butts that you do shows your point of view of as someone who either was a poor student, or a fellow that has been misinformed.
Don’t know what state you live in but I have never heard of teachers with a DUI being fired. I had a coworker whose sister was hit and killed in a car accident by an off duty cop and the guy was taken care of by the cops and he was never breathalized until hours later and of course he passed by then. Two recent cases of sexual activity by female teachers with male students in the news. Both teachers were fired but never even charged with statutory rape. No male teachers get that kind of plush treatment. Not saying all teachers are bad but they seem to get away with a lot that the ordinary person does not.
I fear it’s too late for politics to do much of anything worthwhile. When a bunch of politicians get together they can talk for ever and the end will always be something of a compromise. Our future is out children and should not be compromised in no way, fashion or from. There is a strong possibility that the only real answer is a radical one. You have the pleasure of thinking of those types of ways. Each to their own, but somehow those crazies must be stopped from decimating out future.
How about the fact that Jeb Bush was/ is a strong supporter of “Common Core” And when he was Governor of Florida he was promoting the “bright” idea that we should “allow” the Illegals,to have Driver’s License’s……and he’s a “Republican/ Conservative”?? Totally “off the wall”….what gives with these screwballs?
Sadly, none of the Bush boys were or are conservatives from Prescott to Jeb. If anything can categorize them it would be they are at best moderate democrats. There was a time when moderate democrats were not that bad. They were mostly south of the Mason Dixon and held quite conservative views. But since the 1960’s they have adopted the socialist agenda. That allows them to “buy votes” from all the people they give handouts to. You know the money you and I pay as taxes that they use against us to subvert our government. .
William, we share the same thoughts!…….The one that annoys me the most is the ultimate indecency of the “Liberals” that it is “acceptable” for Homosexuals to “adopt” children. Just another SICK part of Obama’s “Legacy”.
There is a television show called modern family that has two homos that adopted a little girl. Things of that nature are exactly how small children are getting programmed into such things. I seriously don’t believe that those that write programs like that have a limit because each one is trying to outdo the rest so they will always keep raising the limit to what they are capable of. So sad but I sometimes think it’s too late.
There you go! That is exactly what I will do!
Nice take, Mark. I personally think that so-called “tranny” law is the dumbest piece of legislation that ever came down the pike., There, the liberal loons are trying to get us to believe that “gender identity” is everything and biology is nothing. And they incorporate that complete and total nonsense into law! Bizarre…
Well I was just really making the point of these political traitors pushing crap laws down our throats that the government has no business pushing “for the people by the people” the second amendment is layer out in our Constitution but every one has the same rights if you choose not to use it is on you. But your choices as in choosing not to bear arms or sexual should not mean you get extended rights on top of mine that ultimately infringe on the rights of others.
And you’re exactly right…
Simply put, there is no such thing as “Transgender”!
Bingo! But the goofy libs try to tell us that if one, Hulk Hogan for example (beard and all), wakes up one morning looks in the mirror and see a beautiful young lady looking back, “gender identity” kicks in which give the Hulk the right to go to any public beach and shower with the ladies and the little children, of course, because he “feels” and “identifies” as female. This is insane! It’s putting feelings above the rule of law. But it makes all those progressive snowflakes happy…
I think a bunch of some type of homos that were connected got together and used their pull to do this type of dirt to us.
There is no such thing as “Trans-Sexual”.
Try and keep up, “little snowflake.” It only takes 51, now.
Sorry uninformed snowflake but the 51 vote non filibuster rule only applies to political appointments not legislation.
??
NOPE; ONLY 51 thanks to the Dimocraps.
Pam and other nummies…. the 60 rule for cloture was a60 vote count…. does not mean that a REAL TALKING filibuster can’t still happen….means it actually HAS to happen…. then again, there are rule issues that can prevent that if craftily applied…. this is going to be uncharted ground for everyone. as far as Pappy450 and others are concerned, I am not sure the 60 vote rule was ever actually canned…massaged?? maybe…. I think taking the idea that ramming the legislation down throats will not get folks riled up to the point of action may be risky. lots of middle of the road folks may take that as abuse of power….and losing seats isn’t a good thing.
I guess it seems you have forgotten Harry Reids famous “nuclear option” he shoved in. NOW WE can use it too! SO dream on…WE DO have “enough” SO suck it up buttercup watch for MANY “changes” that were always BLOCKED by Harry.
I believe Harry Reid remedied that 60 vote threshold when the Democrats used ” the nuclear option” requiring only a one vote majority.
Thank you Dirty Harry Reid.
Sorry to burst your bubble but Harry Reid opened Pandora’s box with his rule changing “nuclear option” use whenever he couldn’t collect enough support. It’s now the other sides turn and I pray they use it as often as necessary.
Several Dems are up for reelection – NRA can oppose those few who oppose this bill.
Sorry, but the democrats passed the law so that it only takes a simple majority for many things now.
No, actually it doesn’t take sixty votes in the US Senate to pass legislation. Sixty is a super majority. In the case of a Presidential veto it takes two-thirds vote in each Chamber which is sixty seven votes in the Senate. However, the Majority Leader needs 60 votes in order to allow the Senate to vote on a bill.
It take 51 thanks to Harry Reid.
we have come a long way already … what I see is not to give up and clear out Rinos (esp McCain, Ryan, McConnell) in both houses, along with evil Dumbocrats (Schumer for example) and that dingbat Pelosi …
And how about changing the training of feds, etc in regarding to the “Potential Terrorists” to identify the lefties/Dumbocrats as such … (look at how they are acting lately and have been behind most of all shootings, etc)
For all I care … those like Soros and top rabblerousers should be put into the barest FEMA camps permanently along with all fake newsmen …
They are all a clear and present danger to America
We must not rest just yet
They may like it. It means licensing and a data base of names. They like categorizing people. Also saves them from sending solicitations to those names.
No, it does not mean that.
You are thinking of an old proposal called the Nation CCW License.
This would be like your drivers and marriage license
You are still on a data base list that can be hacked by criminal organizations, foreign governments or our own federal government.
Easily solved… “What guns? I don’t have no stinking guns”
I agree. The penalty for using a gun in a crime needs to be strong enough to be impressive.
And it needs to be enforced. No dealing away a mandatory gun penalty by liberal lawyers.
Liberal lawyers are only a part of the problem. They get paid to keep their clients out of prison. It’s liberal judges that are the real problem. They get paid to enforce the laws by the people that elect them. When they hand out extremely lenient sentences if any at all they are the ones that need to be fired. In my state there are stories on the news weekly about criminals being arrested for the third or fourth time for an armed offense. This kind of liberal coddling needs to be stopped. States need to take away the “discretionary” sentencing option from judges with regard to crimes committed involving a weapon.
But then WHITE people would end up in jail for gun crimes too….
Is that a problem with you?
racist
Thank you for letting me know you are a racist but I’m sure I could tell from your posts…
Libturd! Is that the best you’ve Got! Start calling names when you can’t intelligently contribute to an active conversation.
There is no response for a stupid comment like that except stupid people like you can’t be fixed.
Ditto what Mary Brumley said!
It is my understanding that over a first four year term, Trump has the potential to seat enough Federal judges to counter-balance the damage inflicted by Obama’s Federal bench appointments implemented over eight years.
I head that too. I hope it’s true because our judicial system is packed with liberal activist judges. That is why the democRats use the courts to manipulate legislation all the time and win.
In my opinion, the penalty for using a gun in the commission of a crime should be mandatory life without parole.
Jim….I guess you mean that the convicted then would totally live of the USA fir life……….mandatory life with no parole…..
means federally subsidized housing for life…..you don’t have a clue about such matters.
No, ship them to Mexico.
Lovely prisons I hear.
What..you want to lock up 25% of Chicago? LOL
only 25%??
I think it would probably be more like 75% !!
at least!! even the Ill gov is in prison.
that would only take care of the Illegals.
all true!!
That would be a good start. Pay Mexico to incarcerate them along with their felons. mmmm
only 25%? How about a wall around chc. no door?
yep & then fill it with water.
Actually why waste the water?? Just throw ammo over the wall every couple of days, problem solved!!
I guess we just have to figure out which is cheaper.I’d hate to waste money on the worthless! on the other hand we want to be sure.
50%
Trump’s second task after building the boarder wall … build a wall around Chicago and let the problem in Chicago take care of itself.
With a Chicago Shyster lawyer you could be tossed in prison for life for protecting your self or family. Be VERY careful what you ask for.
tHIS IS A BILL TO TAKE POWER AWAY FROM THE STATES YOU NUMBSKULLS! WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? IT’S ABOUT A CONCEALED CARRY PERMIT! NOT ABOUT A CRIME BEING COMMITTED WITH A GUN! GOOD GRIEF!
The very fact of using a gun, to commit a crime, says the perp was willing to take a life, in the commission of said crime. To me, that says the perp was willing to die, as well.
Death penalty, for aggravated gun crimes.
Defending yourself can be perceived as a crime?
just committing crimes.
That’s why I said “aggravated”.
I don’t see a reason for life without parole sentences why do they continue to burden society when a bullet costs 50 cents tops instead of 2500 a year x,s all people with that sentence.
I don’t think there should be any prison sentence greater than 25 yrs. If whatever you did deserves a sentence greater than that, I think we should just punt, and toast them.
I hear yo Mark BUT your estimate is quite a ways off. It’s closer to $40,000 PER prisoner per year till you factor everything in. cost of guards, medical, prison cloths, cost of the facility, etc., etc!
I agree I only figured the cost of th acual prisoner for face value in comparison to a bullet lol
unless it is fired. then needs to be more impressive.
You want us to pay for their room and board for the rest of their life. I say save my money and think of some other way.
I don’t know how accurate it is anymore but last time I saw it cost between $30 and $50 thousand PER inmate to house them per year when you factor in the meals, medical bills, clothing, building etal, pay for the guards, etc.!
A bullet, depending on caliper is about 50 cents to $1, cost of gun, which is reusable BTW, is about $700 to $1200 depending on the make, model etc.
That equates to $30K per yr. per felon vs $0.50, oops forgot burial expenses at about $5K “ONE TIME” expense and $1K gun (another one time expense)! Hmmm!!!
I would bury them for a lot less than that.
WHAT? This is not about a crime! It is about the individual states rights, not your right to control everyone from a pinnacle of power that is nonexistent except in the minds of the narcissists that want to assume and usurp it!
Right, that’s just what they want, power over individuals which gives them power over the states, which is UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
Splut, Splut, Splut !!
Say why does it SMELL like an unclean barnyard around those head exploded liberals?
It’s their shit for brains, your smelling…
Good!
LOL!!!
Ain’t it the truth!!
They are empty shells anyway, nothing inside that counts!
no concealed weapon law would be good. If you got it, show it. I want to avoid being around people with a gun. I hate wondering if someone is going to shoot me. Let me know you are packing, damn it.
Too many emotional demotards. I carry concealed, will stay concealed. I want it to be a surprise for uncivilized scum….
Of course you will. Coward. Let me know you have it so I can avoid you.
I always have it, cunt….
ernldo, Is that what you call your mother? She has the same equipment.
Stay out of it, snowflake….
You sound like someone to avoid. What language. I have a right to be afraid of you guys and your circular firing squads. How do you know who is who? Just shoot?
Ignorant, Dumb, brainwashed liberal twat is a better description of it.
Yes, avoid me at all costs…and it seems you are not only a coward, but a paranoid as well….
Stop whining. If some velcro head tried to get in your pants, you wouldn’t give a shit if his weapon was concealed or not. All you’d be doing is screaming, “Help! Somebody shoot the bastard!” Right?? ?
You would have absolutely no problem avoiding me I carry OPEN right out there in front of GOD and everybody.
Please understand this, I have no desire to be in a situation where I have to use it, it’s not on my list of things to do HOWEVER IF the case does arise rest assured that I WILL use it to protect not only myself but others who don’t have a weapon. We are all NOT gun nuts here lady, some of us are former law enforcement and other facilities.
GEE, seems as though someone either doesn’t have a rebuttal or doesn’t choose to share it with the rest of us.
Thank you! Be safe and I pray you never have to.
She doesn’t understand safety in today’s world. We don’t like shutting anyone but in case of survival or saving another, then yes we want to do what has to be done. On the up side this has not been necessary except in very few cases, so rest easy, Bernadine but be careful opening your door inside or outside because the illegal gunners don’t give a darn about you or yours when they get there.
And what if you accidentally shoot someone who didn’t deserve to die. Are you ready to do time?
NO stupid, we know and PRACTICE gun safety and do NOT “accidentally” shoot people. That’s ONLY libtard morons like YOU that do that.
I hope you shoot yourself you stupid brainless bitch. You can’t even see straight and you didn’t get the gist of what I said because you are a Neanderthal.
You get into cross fires with someone moron, there is always a good chance someone innocent will get killed. Hopefully it will be you. Oh wait, you’re not innocent so you should be shot.
nice, guyi, but how do I know you are one of the good ones??
Because we have a sign hanging around our neck stating….I’m one of the “good Guys”, and I’m carrying a gun…..get real!
Bernadette, I am a Senior disabled Vietnam vet but travel interstate between Massachusetts all over the country . When I was 67 and stopped at an unmanned rest station in I-81 in West VA.and was accosted by a 6’4″ black thug wanting to know how much cash I was carrying . Had he been armed , I might not be here or suffered criminal assault or worse but I had pepper spray I had bought only the day before and though I am only 5’5″ tall was able to subdue and hogtie him with his own belt . When police arrived 8 minutes later, they though the disparity was humorous and I did NOT. Arriving at home, I went to my local Sportsman’s Club, took and passed a competency exam both written and with test firing of both automatic and revolving pistols, single and double action. In MA, an FID will allow you to buy rifles and shotguns but to buy and carry a handgun you must have a concealed carry permit. I went through a local police check a state police, check a federal check and was granted the permit. I have carried in MA for five years for protection because NO PLACE is safe thanks to Obama’s war on police who can ONLY respond to a violent act AFTER the fact. I was at the Boston Marathon when the bombs went off but was not in the immediate area of detonations. Had the Tsarnaevs been earlier identified, I WAS carrying and who knows what may have been prevented? You and all liberals are under no duress to carry if you do not care to but, you have NO right to obstruct those who have a RIGHT to protect heath, home and self from enemies or internal threats and Islam and MS-13, the BLM and NBP and a variety of gangs make such protection for many of us indisputably NECESSARY,! Just one competent armed man or woman at San Bernardino, the Pulse Club or at Fort Hood during the two separate attacks may have been able to limit the loss of life and, if that person had spotted the arms of the terrorists, might have been able to prevent the slaughter altogether. Legally complicit citizens are NOT criminals so, ask yourself why the GOVERNMENT is so determined to make them so, rather than go after the black marketeers and illegitimate dealers, people who have no record and purchase guns for those who cannot get them but are related and other criminals. An armed man is a CITIZEN. an unarmed man a subject. If I was responsible enough to serve honorably in our military , I and all such are responsible enough to have our right respected as we EARNED it.The amendment was written as a single sentence because the Founders KNEW Government over time WILL EXPAND AND GO CORRUPT, ALL DO AND ALWAYS HAVE AND THIS WAS A SAFEGUARD FOR CITIZENS; MORE NECESSARY IN PIONEER SOCIETIES THAN NOW IN THE EYES OF SOME BUT NOT THE WISE! I have had a degree in government for fifty years. Ours today is the epitome of corruption.They seek to disarm all citizens to make the inevitable dictatorship and New World Order a reality. If you know nothing of U.N. Agenda 21: LOOK IT UP! Then be afraid, very afraid, and NOT of those who seek guns for protection. Obama and MANY in BOTH parties are American in name only and seek to use International law to abrogate Constitutional law and so END all freedoms and choices I do NOT believe you would enjoy the life you would then be FORCED to live. Check it out: then reconsider,the life , freedoms and choices you may then save by doing so will NOT be solely your own but the very futures of all our progeny. As a Vietnam Vet, I am one of those other facilities of which Mr. Somers spoke and, unlike Obama and his never confirmed credentials, I have a DD-214 Honorable discharge that bears out the nature of my service and citizenship. period. I am INDEED, ONE OF THE GOOD GUYS!
Good LORD; What an asininely STUPID twat.
Cowards are those SHEEPLE that don’t have the BACKBONE to stand up for their own rights!
DO you run from the police also, THEY carry GINS TOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Obviously they aren’t always the safe ones either. We had a kid shot at a traffic stop here in Michigan. 17 years old because the sheriff didn’t think he was repectful. He is dead now.
More asinine stupidity from the usual moronic source; I bet it kisses bloomburgs ass too.
Snow flake !!? OR ??
Well, Bernadne, since the illegal gotten guns are the problem, we who are trained and know how to handle a weapon, you must watch out for the illegal killers and not us. If one comes to your door with an illegal weapon, what will you do? In today’s world that is happening way too much.
I am a member of Parents of Murdered children. I am very familiar with the murder stories. Thank You. And I have one of my own.
More idiocy from the brainless moronic twat.
I agree. It shouldn’t be concealed like it is not in Texas. In Texas it has to be exposed.
NO stupid. wrong again as usual; Texas DOES permit OPEN CARRY, but they also issue Concealed Carry permits.
You’re such a sorry ass bitch. I hope some nut shoots you douche bag.
DO you realize how asininely STUPID you sound??
If I was standing beside you or behind you, you’d NEVER know I had a gun; Where do you live, maybe I have been near you. I don’t want anybody to know I am packing, so if a liberal dimocrap crook tries to hold me up; Surprise, Surprise, Surprise he gets THREE for free.
Just be glad that people can carry concealed, it has resulted in a drop in crime rates in MANY states and may have kept YOU from being robbed or assaulted.
Lady….You don’t get it do you? Most of us are either (or both) ex-Military, or ex- Police Officers, and we will only use our weapons in self-defense, or to protect people like YOURSELF! Is that clear enough?
Tell that to the victims of shootings and their families. I am know about that personally. Where were you guys then.
You know them? Someone should have been armed to take them down. Like Parisvnot do many casualties that way.
Demotards hate the thought on independent people taking care of themselves….Pass this law!
No, we hate being shot because someone goes off the rail.
Stupid woman! Nobody is shooting dumbocrats…………yet!
No, demotards are shooting demotards….check the ChiCongo stats….
I don’t think they should be shot. Let them live to regret what they created. ( in jail )
let the terrorist from Gitmo they support do it
I honestly believe that you should wake up and smell the roses. Either you have been subject to some awful experience or you have listened to those who have clouded your judgement until you believe them.
My wife also carries for your information.
Baahh Baah Little sheep… we call you a VICTIM!
Right Bernie, the only ones going off the rail are the people on the left. I’m not sure they even know what end of the gun to hold, but I guess they finally figure it out do a pretty good job of shooting a lot of Innocent people and police officers.
No I don’t know which end to hold.
Bernadine,
Look at the political affiliation of mass shooters in the history of this country. Overwhelmingly democrats! In the past couple decades alone, all but two cases, registered democrats, the exceptions being the psycho that shot up the church and the punks in columbine, and they were too young to register – but their parents were democrats. Hell, evem the immigrants that did it were registered democrats. LOOK IT UP, it’s fact! It also stems from the bi-polar, schizophrenic mind set it takes to be a progressive liberal democrat, “celebrate diversity because we’re all the same”, “lets have abortions that murder millions of innocent children but keep guilty murderous sociopaths from the death penalty”. No wonder you people snap.
Hey stupid; All the “shooters” have been BLACKS, Deranged Liberals, and Islamic Terrorists most of whom could not LEGALLY own a firearm. So, When ever you get threatened by a crook, drop you panties and insert your head while handing over your purse, rings and other jewelry.
I see you are a nice person. Who brought you up
Worry about ChiCongo, or Philthadelphia…maybe Dirtroit…forget the law abiding second amendment adherents, who take protecting their families seriously……..
I’m a liberal and I believe they ought to pass the law. I would love to get a tank and get behind your car. Damn that would be fun
its already been a movie, with James arness n a bunch of other people, it was funny and a prelude too tuat u wanna do. ohhhh! its called TANK! go to google archives. happy new year, and keep on dreaming. dreams are real!
Yup, you and Mike Dukakis great Tank guys.
Here’s the best tank guy https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/829e76e5f6a44578892030c983f4cc6ad8ffcd9e09a8a9bd002015ede7ce685d.png
and you are a gun owner? hmm That makes me feel secure.
2nd amendment rights are for evereeee body. Not just you
Unbelievable liberals probably city folks feel such a threat? In my state i can carry either way but prefer concealed, like you i don’t want crooks to know whats coming. This Bill only lost by 1 vote a year ago i pray it passes! NRA-USA
Correct. I hate watching the emotional demotards go nuts, I’d rather they NOT know they are actually safer than if I weren’t armed. Been packing forty years, showed once, never fired….
Trump Taj Mahal was located in Christie’s New Jersey.
Were concealed guns allowed there?
NJ has impossible CCW laws. It has nothing to do with DJT.
Nothing?
Didn’t Trump consider Christie for AG?
ONLY as a joke and to turn him down.
How long did DJT consider Christie for AG?…An hour? NJ is actually tougher than NYS [forget about NYC] to get a CCW. In NJ. It [hard to get CCW] had nothing to do with Christie.
Of course, that doesn’t stop the skels.
Christie wasn’t responsible for the stupid gun laws, nor the feral apes that have NO respect for law…
Hey lantern, your light ran out of gas and went out.
amen
What’s your point?
You are so correct. Lets say some crazy walks in some place to shoot everyone. If this person sees and knows that someone else has a gun, that would probably the first person to get shot’ Open carry is not a good thing. Plus the fact that someone just might call the police to report it.
I still like open carry when hunting shoulder holster with my trusty revolver but in public no like other’s have said there’s no surprise for a crook. The NRA is really working for folks in New Jersey personally i wouldn’t live in a state that violates or minimizes my #2 rights that’s just me though. NRA-ILA
Ditto!
Amen, alleluia alleluia, alleluia! So let it be written: So let it be DONE!
I’ve carried a .380auto since I came back from Nam in ’68. I never worried about a damned permit!! ?
I’ve had a couple permits, in Cull-ifornia (no joke) but moved…anyway, the second amendment is MY permit….
The Second Amendment is the ONLY “permit” any of us need!….What a crock they’re handing out!
We don’t no need no stinkin’ permits to paraphrase a Mexican phrase.
wer do u live? cuz the new prez is gona make a national gunn license law, wait 4 it ?!
No, now you’re being the moron I always thought you were.
And… I’ll take spelling for $100
I live in Orlando, Florida, right where they’re looking for the chump that killed his pregnant girlfriend and killed a police officer. And
sooner or later, they’ll catch him. When they do, I hope they pump his pimpy ass bull of lead.
Good for you Michael. You did you time and you have a right to protect yourself.
There may be a few let’s give them a chance on this but don’t be disappointed if they do the same ole thing. It really is getting tiring you know.
2018 is coming. A lot of those democrats are going to be replaced.
Perfectly logical and I hope this gets included in the bill.
God’s speed! It only makes sense. This we’ll defend. So help us God.
Thanks to Eric Holder and the FBI, fiends like Viktor Bout are behind bars!
He was a Russian arms dealer.
He tried, to sell arms, to Colombian outlaws.
They wanted to murder Americans!
The FBI nabbed him!
Expect Bout to defend our Constitution?
Putin?
What?….and Obama didn’t let him out of Jail already???
This law has been an overdue extension of our already 2d amend. right and it is not a relaxing of gun control philosophy because it effects only proper permit holders. Criminals do not hold concealed carry permits as they do not legally possess handguns as a rule. It will not impact gun violence, but it will help keep a legal permit holder safe and able to cross state lines without worry. There is no valid reason the anti-crowd should oppose it.
Two thousand guns to Mexican drug lords – Foreign nationals allowed to flood across the border and stay here – Illegal aliens with violent criminal records released from prison and not deported – What serious argument could those Democrats have against permitting U.S. citizens an adequate means of defending themselves?
Democrats DO NOT THINK, they are BRAIN DEAD and are incapable of serious arguments or thought processes. Besides, why would we want to defend ourselves.
Why doesn’t everyone start calling them what they are: Communists! Just because they “took over the Democratic Party does not make them “Democrats”!
Commies are about right. In 2010 in My Home state of MA, we had 10 reps. Every one of them was a card carrying member of the DSA. (Democratic Socialists of America) Now the title preferred is “Progressives.! They are nothing but mobocrats and the worst of them all in MA is Elizabeth, The Fake Indian Warren with a mouth the size of a the Grand Canyon and a brain as empty as it is!
Liberal heads are exploding…I can hear the popping. What a lovely sound.
Car accidents kill far more than gun accidents. Why haven’t we limited driving privileges to IN STATE drivers within each state. Most gun death in the perverted USA happen in “gun free zones” whereby evil people have open access to doing evil things with guns. It’s like leaving wild dogs; wolves and foxes to guard chicken coops.
By law Swiss citizens must own and know how to fire guns. There is little gun violence in Switzerland. Switzerland wasn’t invaded by Hitler because it made chocolate; but because it was armed to the teeth. Even today Switzerland has more armed citizens fully trained on how to use their weapons than the entire remainder of all armed forces within the feckless EU. Check it out.
Well as far as I’m told my indiana license is honored by 12 other states but this would make life a lot easier.
Florida License is good in MANY states.
Correction, NO license is necessary anywhere in the United States, read the Second Amendment……Wake up People!
The 2nd Amendment to the US CONSTITUTION gives you the RIGHT to “bear” which means CARRY, so why do we Need a law making that RIGHT into a State’s PRIVILEGE?
Do away with ALL “Carry Laws” !
I fully agree with what you are saying but the fact is that until they stop destroying our Constitution and rights. These laws are yes crappy but also provide a little protection for us that do carry legally. But it is to bad that the people that are against the second amendment aren’t the ones getting robbed. That would change the tunes of some of these idiots. I know of a few people the were anti gun then got robbed and now the carry.
lets have sum uniformatie!? christ ona cross, there ARE STATES RIGHTS, AND THERE IS national conformity! that way THE Labials in nys,cal,Minn,mich, have too asslick the world with the rest of the USA! and make the clock a universal time zone across the USA.
Please learn to write intelligent, coherent sentences and paragraphs.
Thank you. I have no idea what the sensrbtch said.
What this nation really needs is more guns in the hands of the people, below.
I know my gun needs more rights.
The list needs updating, but the last line is still valid…
In 1865 a Democrat shot and killed Abraham Lincoln,
President of the United States.
In 1881 a left wing radical Democrat shot James Garfield,
President of the United States who later died from the wound.
In 1963 a radical left wing Democrat socialist shot and killed John F.
Kennedy, President of the United States.
In 1975 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at Gerald Ford, President of the United States.
In 1983 a registered Democrat shot and wounded Ronald Reagan, President of the United States.
In 1984 James Hubert, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and
killed 22 people in a McDonalds restaurant.
In 1986 Patrick Sherrill,a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 15 people in an Oklahoma post office.
In 1990 James Pough, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 10
people at a GMAC office.
In 1991 George Hennard, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 23 people in a Luby’s cafeteria in Killeen, TX.
In 1995 James Daniel Simpson, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 5 coworkers in a Texas laboratory.
In 1999 Larry Ashbrook, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 8 people at a church service.
In 2001 a left wing radical Democrat fired shots at the White House in a failed attempt to kill George W. Bush, President of the US.
In 2003 Douglas Williams, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people at a Lockheed Martin plant.
In 2007 a registered Democrat named Seung-Hui Cho, shot and killed 32 people at Virginia Tech.
In 2010 a mentally ill registered Democrat named Jared Lee Loughner, shot Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and killed 6 others.
In 2011 a registered Democrat named James Holmes, went into a movie theater and shot and killed 12 people.
In 2012 Andrew Engeldinger, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people in Minneapolis.
In 2013 a registered Democrat named Adam Lanza, shot and killed 26 people in a school in Newtown, CT.
As recently as Sept 2013, an angry Democrat named Aaron Alexis shot 12 at the Washington Navy Shipyard in Washington, D.C.
Not one NRA member, Tea Party member, or Republican conservative was involved in any of these shootings and murders.
Clearly, there is a problem with Democrats and guns.
What is really needed is a Federal Law declaring that the 2nd Amendment of our Constitution is all that is necessary for someone to carry a firearm anywhere in the country. Our right to carry and defend ourselves is a God given right and should not be subject to the whims of government at any level.
Your last sentence in essence literally underlines the statement “shall not be infringed upon”! Why do we need a “Law” to define the Second Amendment? The Constitution is very CLEAR to me just as it is!
I agree but the government at all levels refuse to see it that way. They still want to control and have a list of those who carry. By adding a federal law that blanketly supersedes all the other state and local laws it will solidify the backing of the Constitution. I wish it wasn’t necessary as I believe that the Constitution clearly states that our right to carry is a God given right, not subject to the whims of government but that clearly isn’t the case at the moment.
Because the government and many people don’t acknowledge that fact.
Good idea,but good luck if the liberal democrats have anything to do with this.
Onward and upward!
I carry mine in any state I want to carry it in, anyway. Always have….always will. I imagine that I have PLENTY of company.
hahahahahahah. suck it up liberals
The First Amendment protects one and the Second Amendment protects the other!
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/78793e5b4634428ff13891d8a4ca97a7309e93a7cab07ea591959ea9861adb34.jpg
Please guys, read the Second Amendment over to yourselves a few times….when does everyone read it at “face” value? The right to “Bear” arms Is giving us the right have possession at any time we see fit! License to carry be damned..the Constitution gives us permission. How about the part that states “shall not be infringed upon”? That means that any “law” that restricts our right to own OR carry a weapon is Unconstitutional, and therefore illegal and unenforceable! Hello!
Just a brief change of subject. What’s your opinion?
Someone in the future is going to work one morning in his self driving car.
This person decides to take a nap til they get to work.
While the driver is asleep, the car malfunctions.
Uh Oh !!!!!!!
I support a national carry permit. I hold 3 permits to cover many states, BUT, what laws have come out of DC the last 8 years that have given us the “disastrous Obama years”?
The 2nd Amendment to the US CONSTITUTION gives you the RIGHT to “bear” which means CARRY, so why do we Need a law making that RIGHT into a State’s PRIVILEGE?
Bachelor, either they can’t read English, or are in support of Government Oppression!
With the hodge podge of laws that exists from state to state constitutional carry would be better.
UNIVERSAL BACROUND CHECKS !!!!!!!!!!
This should be connected with voter reg. also !!
About time, Go president Trump
I’m a big believer in States’ Rights. I believe that each state has the right to enact whatever laws it wants and the people of each state have the right to contest those laws if they don’t approve. However, the Constitution is not negotiable. NO state has the right to make laws that are contrary to the Constitution. I say the 2nd Amendment IS my carry permit (the right of the people to keep and bear arms SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED). You don’t need a permit to exercise your other rights, so why do we need one to exercise our 2nd Amendment rights? If you have to get a permit, that’s the same as asking permission to exercise a right.
You’ve got it right Jim….maybe we need to start a nationwide petition to repeal all of the “Permit” laws? If anyone should get arrested, and it went to court, it would be dismissed by any judge that wasn’t corrupt,….but the courts are pretty much “controlled” by the Politicians, unfortunately!
We need a national concealed carry law for every state !
The 2nd Amendment to the US CONSTITUTION gives you the RIGHT to “bear” which means CARRY, so why do we Need a law making that RIGHT into a State’s PRIVILEGE?
i want this and silencers being like buying a gun vs. waiting 9 mos and paying a huge federal fee
The 2nd Amendment to the US CONSTITUTION gives you the RIGHT to “bear” which means CARRY, so why do we Need a law making that RIGHT into a State’s PRIVILEGE?
The President should instruct his New AG to go after Every CongressCritter who has EVER Voted for a gun control measure and charge them All with violation of The Constitution under 18 USC 241 & 242, which would put them in JAIL for the Rest of their miserable lives!
“Shall not be infringed” means shall NOT be Trespassed against!
LOCK THEM UP!!
DRAIN THE SWAMP!
States included!
My feelings, VERBATIM!
AMEN, Brother!
Second Amendment rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights does not stop at a states border or should never have before either. So this new law just puts it into words that every states law enforcement, politicians and courts can understand. Hudson is exactly right. The only thing bad is that we need another law to make the Bill of rights work as they were supposed to. As much panic as the liberals tried to create over concealed carry laws, crime rates in every state that allows CC has seen then drop significantly. The huge increase in shootings in Chicago is certainly an anomaly and when the perpetrators are captured show they are not CC permit holders. Criminals don’t bother getting CC permits or obtain their guns legally. Liberals know it but refuse to admit the truth as usual.
The right to carry in all states is a Second Amendment Right! The government SHALL NOT INFRINGE on that right. The requirement to be licensed is an infringement, period! The licensing process puts our names in data bases and sets citizens up for confiscation. Our government has shown us in the past weeks that those data bases are not secure. Hackers, whether they are local criminals, foreign intelligence, or even our own government can access those data bases and know just were to go when they want to take our weapons. The IBC process identifies the make and model of each weapon I buy and ties the serial number of that weapon to me.
It should be my choice to get a license to carry (LTC) not the governments. The only requirement to get a LTC should be a simple check to see if I am a convicted felon not eligible to carry or have been judged mentally defective by proper judicial process. If I am NOT on either of those lists, I am eligible to purchase and carry. But the problem here is that the governments, states and federal, can’t even make those data base lists work properly. As for the no fly list, just because a person is judged mentally defective or is a felon is not a reason to keep them from flying.
The bottom line is that the government is still pushing to be all controlling in every aspect of our lives.
The republicans only need 51 votes
The Republicans will not get all those votes now that Trump is on the hot seat over that Russian hacking. YOu can’t seriously think your Republicans will want to appear to be traitors do you?
Keep on wishing.
Liberals don’t give a shit what you assholes do with guns in your states. You bring them into ours and we stick them up your asses and pull the triggers. The day you try to override OUR states rights, is the day you see millions of liberals, progressives, centrists and all those minorities YOU hate marching into the south and midwest and DRAINING YOUR SWAMPS.
If you think liberals and minority’s don’t own guns,think again.
I know lots of liberals and minorities who own guns. Most of them are legal and are cops. See? Up north, cops come in all races, colors and creeds and both genders. Unlike your Johnny Comes Marchin Home Militia boys who hide out and play war games in your woods.
You have absolutely no idea what you’re talking about. You need to stop watching movies about rednecks and get a life.
Hey asshole…do you always ASSume? I was married to a redneck from the Florida Panhandle. That red enough for you? One thing he wasn’t was a chicken shit like you hicks are. I don’t need to watch movies to know that you rednecks are adverse to ever being educated. More than 50% of the south and midwest are “ignernts” who barely finish high school and want the kinds of jobs that no longer exist in today’s technologically advanced society. All you know are those 3 shift Oil, coal mining and fracking jobs.
You idiots don’t want to pay for the things you need. You want others to do it for you. That’s why MS, Arkansas, KS, IA, Alaska, TN, NC, GA, KY and AL are 10 of the top states that collect welfare from the federal government. You want it? Pay for it from your state taxes like we have to do in Dem states.
Rednecks spend millions on their guns and then stiff their kids on education. Your states have the least number of Ivy League colleges, least number of students who end up in the nation’s most educated. Why? Yours are the states that take 65% of every US budget. But do go on ahead and try to lay the blame for the national deficit on us when it is your fukking states that take the most every year out of our tax dollars. Need proof asshole? Go to the GAO.gov. Find me one Republican state that gets 55 cents for the $1 they pay in Federal taxes. There isn’t any. That’s because ONLY the Dem states average that 55 cents and your pig brained asshole states get from $1.35 up to Alaska’s $1.87 for that $1. Eat shit and die you bastards. You are not going to take our tax dollars and then act like high handed assholes.
I can very well understand why you WAS, married. POOR GUY. Oh and, thanks for the money.
WRong asshole. I never wanted to BE married. But, I did want children. And my ex was a big time alcoholic who refused to seek professional help. According to him, like you, booze wasn’t not a problem. No. For him it wasn’t. For his sons and his wife it was…especially when he had to be picked up out of the gutters or by the cops. Sorry..I don’t hand over 4 decades of my life to anyone who cannot admit they have a serious problem…That apply to you too?
We Militia “boys” (typical Liberal “label”} as you call us, are something you just wouldn’t even want to mess with, unless you “like” the “lose, Lose” scenario!
They apparently own most of the illegal weapons!
If McConnell has difficulty remembering what Harry Reid did to advance his causes without opposition consent let this jog his memory “Boom, Nuclear Option!” He specifically changed the rules so, he and now the Republicans only need 50 votes to pass and filibusters can’t happen – thank you Dirty Hairy! As for McConnell stop blustering and get busy: lots of repealing and passing of new laws to do and little time (so far only 4 years) to do it in! We have over 100 years of progressivist/Communist/statism to undo and give Chucky Schumoo a grand case of shock and awe to douse his cocky aggression style.
I think this would be a good law….unlike Obamacare which reeks of special interests and over taxation.
Also individuals on the no-buy-list for guns should have the right to see all the information and the sources. Further, the cost of challenging the accuracy of the list should be paid by the government and you should not need a lawyer.
Hope it passes.
And I thought republicans were all about states rights…. just another example or republicans being full of bull$hit… I don’t think ANY states will give you a drivers license without verifying you can drive, unlike gun permits…
But can you not drive to another state If you do have a license?
ALL states require you to show you know how to drive! NOT all states require you to show you can handle a gun before they give you your permit!
The bill is not about obtaining a permit to carry a weapon. It’s about being able to carry your legal weapon with an already legally obtained permit across any state line without fear of harassment from law enforcement officials in adjoining states. And I agree most people do need to take a course in firearms safety, self defense, and execution of of such weapons. Let’s face facts, some people just don’t need a gun in thier hands but when some lunatic starts shooting people around you, I promise, you and I will only hope and pray, someone will have a gun and know how to use it.
Many states now refuse to honor permits from other states because SOME states will give you a gun permit with no actual qualifying at all! I don’t want someone with a gun around me simply because they wanted one! If there is a “national permit” we need “national requirements ” for getting one!
I am ex-Military, and just took a firearms course, simply because it has been many years since I was Military, and more specifically because I wanted knowledge of today’s firearms and the latest methods of safety, etc. Being ex-Military, I was NOT required to attend a class, but did it on my own! I would strongly recommend that any single woman living alone purchase a weapon, and above all, get yourself well trained on the use of it. As a matter of fact, in the class I attended, there were twice the number of women as there were men, and I told each and every one of them that I was personally glad that they were there!
I have a problem with Americans not being able to protect themselves unless they buy a permit. That is unconstitutional. Shall not be infringed does not mean if we give you permission.
The federal government should have to reimburse all permit fees to everyone unconstitutionally made to buy one every year.
Absolutely.
The Second Amendment IS the only “permit” we need!
Without endless bureaucratic double-talk one hopes.
THE ARTICAL HAS A GLARING FLAW AND WRONG ASSERTION…: “HARRY REID” “EX” DUMBOCRAP MAJORITY LEADER (FIRST 4 YEARS OF THE TRAITOR IN CHIEFS REIN )..”CHANGED” THE—-” 60 “—- VOTE RULE IN THE SENATE TO—“50”— VOTES TO PASS OR DENY A APPOINTEES APPROVAL..AND TO PASS OR DEFEAT A BILL…..SINCE AS STATED THE GOP HAS A 52 VOTE MAJORITY…THE GOP DOES “NOT” EVEN NEED THE DUMBOCRAP MINORITY OF 48 VOTES TO PASS “ANYTHING.” “HARRY REID” IN HIS CONDECENDING ARROGANCE USING THE “BULLY PULPIT” HAS MADE THE DUMBOCRAP MINORITY IMPOTENT AND IRRELAVENT…HANDING THE GOP THE UNIQUE ULTIMATE POWER TOOLS TO JAM “ANYTHING” THE GOP DIVINES IT WANTS ( INCLUDING TRUMP’S AGENDA ) DOWN THE DUMBO CRAPS THROAT OR UP THEIR ARSE……”HARRY REID” WHO WAS SOOOOOO SURE KILLERY WOULD WIN….NEVER CHANGED IT BACK ( TO THE –60–VOTE RULE )….LOL…LOL…IN THE SECOND 4 YEARS OF THE TRAITOR IN CHIEFS REIN THEY LOST THE MAJORITY IN CONGRESS….AND IT WAS TO LATE TO CHANGE IT BACK……ALSO: “HARRY REID” SET “PRECEDANCE” WHEN HE USED THE “NUCLEAR OPTION”—–96—-TIMES TO SUSPEND THE FILIBUSTER (IN WHICH THE DUMBOCRAP PARTY INSTALLED “ALL” OF THE TRAITOR IN CHIEFS APPOINTEES AND SOME BILLS..OBAMACARE BEING AMONG THOSE BILLS )…WHICH SUSPENDS ARGUMENTS…WHICH SHUTS OUT THE MINORITY PARTIES PARTICIPATION IN THE COMPROMISE PROCESS AND “POLITICAL” PROCESS ON ANY APPOINTEE OR BILL….AND BRINGS THE “ISSUE” UP FOR A UP OR DOWN VOTE ON THE APPOINTEE OR THE BILL…..SO..”HARRY REID” YOUR THE MAN !!! THANK YOU SO MUCH YOU ARROGANT CONDECENDING ARSE FOR GIVING THE GOP THE UNIQUE AND “ALL” POWERFUL TOOLS TO GET THE “JOB DONE” IN A MOST EXPEDITIOUS MANNER POSSIBLE…LOL…LOL…YOUR THE MAN “HARRY REID”…YOUR THE MAN !!!…THANK YOU SOOOOO MUCH !!!!
I hope the bill includes non resident licenses too, so people who live in “may issue States” California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, and Rhode Island can enjoy the same freedoms as the rest of the Country. That would essentially put an end to the unconstitutional “may issue” dilemma, since you can get a non resident license from one of many States.
Is it that they just woke up and discovered that we actually have a constitution and have had for over 240 yrs? It is only when they begin manically taking away the gun rights to where their draconian gun laws have made crime go up sky high! I do not believe for one moment these inner cities are able to get these guns for themselves, I do believe that they are being shipped in wholesale by the government so that can be a reason for more gun confiscation.
It’s just common sense to standardize carry permits across this nation. We don’t leave our rights at home when we go to work. But common sense is waisted on the left, they have none!
So, let me get this straight. We should be able to have guns in schools, guns everywhere we choose. Am I correct? Then why can’t we have guns at the inauguration, which have been banned. Are you afraid your fearless leader, Trump, might bite the bullet. No, if you can have guns in schools, then there should be guns allowed at the inauguration. Where’s Wango Tango Nugent on this matter?
Because of the threats of violence from the lunatic left and drooling dog democrats, security has been and should be the ONLY armed presence at the inauguration. There will be bikers in attendance as a crowd control volunteer force who approve of Trump as most are honorably serving VETERANS; long denied decent treatment or earned befits BY these Obamabots and the fraud in chief, but, ONLY FOR ANOTHER FIVE DAYS AND THANK GOD FOR THAT, THOUGH IT BE PRESENTLY POLITICALLY DANGEROUS AND INCORRECT TO SO STATE UNTIL NEXT FRIDAY! Independence Day comes 6 months early this year!
You’re such a tard. Btw, yes, guns on school grounds is a great idea. Did you notice that the single underlying aspect of all the school shootings, was there was no legal gun owners there to defend the innocent. Ignorant people like you kept an armed citizen from being able to protect those kids and teachers.
great law
IF these fools take our guns away like the liberals want, don’t everyone realize criminals DO NOT obey the law and they will have guns. So any one that wants gun control must realize that they will kill many law abiding citizens. These fools should be held accountable for taking our guns away. Just like Obummer releasing criminals out of jail, he should do the time with the criminal he let out of jail when they commit the crime and get put back in jail!!!
I love it. Go Trump, lets kick their ass
An action called a crime when self defense is the motive? Bullet in the front,bullet in the back. Self defense against a gun, self defense against chemicals, self defense against a knife, self defense against a toy gun, self defense against a beat down, mugging, domestic violence, car jacking, road rage, against a demonstrator gone violent, a neighbor’s dog attacking you or your child. I am an elderly person and perceive everything potentially violent or has the potential to commit violence on my person. I can’t afford a lawyer nor could i survive “any” time in jail. So shoot them and let God sort them out. Better 12 in judgement than 6 pall bearrers. This is getting as bad as figuring out the tax law. O ya I have had the irs lie to me.
WE THE PEOPLE SHOULD NOT BE FORCED TO PURCHASE A CARRY PERMIT—The United States Constitution CLEARLY STATES: “The RIGHT of the PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.”—–The ‘cost’ of purchasing a permit to participate in a CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT–is NO DIFFERENT THAN A “POLL TAX”–declared ILLEGAL and UNCONSTITUTIONAL by the Supreme Court. And a former Supreme Court RULED in Murdock v Pennsylvania, (1943) that it is UNCONSTITUTIONAL TO TAX, VIA A LICENSE FEE–the exercise of a CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED RIGHT.
It also is consistent with the US Constitution where state issued documents are recognized by all other states, just like drivers licenses and marriage licenses!
I have hope in Calif.
This is really the rights of the states, which have individual power and are not going to acquiesce to the powers of the ‘fed’ for this or any other reason, or shouldn’t, because that is giving up your power of your state. I agree that it is a good idea to have reciprocity where gun permits are concerned, but it really is not a matter of FEDERAL authority to do so! Check the Constitution, it’s called STATES RIGHTS and SUPERCEDES ANYTHING FEDERAL! Too long this has been ignored and those with the the idea in their own mind that they have more authority than they do have been doing end runs around the actual authority of the States to the point of almost extinction of the states! Let’s not forget what this country is made up of, individual states and their individual participation. We are not going to continue the tradition of trampling the rights of the individuals in the individual states for the power hungry power trips of those who assume and usurp that authority! So, this is a matter of the states to agree upon, not for some FEDERAL authority to approve or disapprove.
If California denied a right guaranteed by a federal law, California authorities could be held accountable for civil and criminal charges.
First of all, the Dems are not in a bubble. The only ones that think that are in the bubble themselves, seeing the world as though it were from their own perspective and denying the fact that those on the Left are communist and wanting our nation destroyed as a Republic! Break out of your bubble and call a spade a spade and stop making excuses as if those on the Left were Americans. They are not, they are Communist or sympathizers who want the destruction of ALL OUR RIGHTS, INCLUDING GUNS SO THEY CAN HAVE AN EASIER TIME OF SENDING IN THEIR TROOPS TO TAKE COMPLETE MILITARY CONTROL OF US ALL! GET REAL! The DEMS are traitors to our nation and to our Founding Fathers, who wanted LIBERTY AND JUSTICE AND FREEDOM, SO THEY FOUGHT HARD AND SHED THEIR BLOOD AND LOST THEIR LIVES TO GAIN IT FOR US. NOW WE ARE THROWING IT ALL AWAY BY DREAMING THAT OUR ENEMIES ARE LESS THAN THEY REALLY ARE AND DON’T REALLY POSE A THREAT. WHEN THEY ARE PASSING BILLS LEFT AND RIGHT AGAINST YOU AND ME, TAKING AWAY OUR LIBERTIES UNDER THE CLOAK OF DARKNESS OR IN THE EVENT CONGRESS IS ADJOURNED, PASS BILLS WITH ILLEGAL AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL ‘EXECUTIVE ORDERS’ THEY HAVE NO RIGHT EVEN SPEAKING OF LET ALONE IMPLEMENTING, IT IS TIME TO CALL THINGS LIKE THEY REALLY ARE AND STOP THE BUBBLEHEADING, DREAMING, WILD CONCOCTIONS OF WHO THE LEFT REALLY IS. THEY ARE THE ENEMY AND ARE TAKING YOUR COUNTRY AWAY FROM YOU, ONE PEN STROKE AT A TIME! WAKE UP AMERICA, STOP ALLOWING YOUR COUNTRY TO SLIP THROUGH YOUR FINGERS AND TAKE IT BACK! MAGA!
(safe) Gun practices and gun laws are but another truth. The truth shall set you free!
I hope it passes.
People that have gone through the trouble to obtain Concealed Carry Permits, are generally law abiding citizens. I can’t recall a single instance of a murder, or other crime being done by a person carrying arms under a Concealed Carry Permit. Liberals raise such a fuss, but don’t demand better of the municipalities of Chicago, Detroit, Baltimore, Los Angeles, and other cites were murders happen too frequently by criminals with illegal guns.
Get them, the Democrats, on record as to how they vote. It will be additional ammunition to use against them during the next election. Getting and keeping their lucrative jobs is a big deal to many of them.
You guys should sign up for National Association for Gun Rights, (NAGR) to get the whole story I just got an email from them and it stated that they want this permitting taken over by the BATFE. Be careful what you wish for. This could end up in a national database that the libs could use later on. Personally I’m all for reciprocity, but it only needs to be done at the state level.
We already have gun rights…it’s called the 2nd Amendment.
Really, try crossing into California from Arizona with a gun, concealed or not. You’ll be calling your lawyer from jail, and you won’t be getting your gun back. Of course we need this law.
Can any of you morons out there explain the 2nd amendment? It states that you have the right to protect yourself with a gun if the Government attacks you. It doesn’t say that every 10 year old should have an AR-15 in case his buddy Billy makes him mad and he can use it to blow his head into the next county. If a machine gun makes you feel like you have a pair, then get one and go fight for some militia. You don’t need a 100-round magazine to stop a prowler.Nuts will always find a way to get a gun and use it. No Government can stop it, but sometimes citizens might see something wrong and report it to prevent a catastrophe. If what happened to the babies at Sandy Hook could not open all of our eyes, this country is doomed.
States like CA have decided to limit and restrict the 2nd Amendment so much that it is, in fact, an infringement on our Constitutional rights. Until the Supreme Court puts a permanent stop to the insane attempts to regulate our gun ownership rights in states like CA, they will keep layering more and more restrictions upon gun owners to the point where they will essentially come and confiscate virtually any and all guns you may have. In CA, that is their goal. They aren’t even shy about saying it – they don’t want anyone to have any guns, period. Until the Supreme Court puts them straight, they will persist and try to pass every possible restriction until owning a gun will be outright illegal in the state of CA. It has to stop. SCOTUS has to make a ruling. Otherwise what we see in Chicago will come to LA and SF. Outright lawlessness, 20-30 shootings every night. Why? Because you took all the guns away from the good guys and the bad guys know it! Gun control isn’t about safety – its about controlling a population and making us all sheep. Government should have a healthy fear of the populace, and for good reason. our forefathers wanted our leaders to know that if they got out of line and got to big and became too oppressive, the people could rise up and overthrow them.
If you don’t like guns don’t have one but don’t take my rights away from me.
I agree that nationwide carry is a real good idea. Don’t like it TOUGH !